ArticleNature communications2019
A nanophotonic laser on a graph.
Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Few-shot neuromorphic vision in a nonlinear photonic network laser.Science advances · 2026Article
- Mode Visualization and Control of Complex Lasers Using Neural Networks.ACS photonics · 2025Article
- Deep-subwavelength engineering of stealthy hyperuniformity.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Microcavity- and Microlaser-Based Optical Barcoding: A Review of Encoding Techniques and Applications.ACS photonics · 2023Review
- Sensitivity and spectral control of network lasers.Nature communications · 2022Article
- WOACS applied nano materials · 2022Article
- Isoscattering strings of concatenating graphs and networks.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Enhanced Electrospinning of Active Organic Fibers by Plasma Treatment on Conjugated Polymer Solutions.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2020Article
- Controllable Polarization of Lasing Emission From a Polymer Microfiber Laser.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional nanophotonic schemes minimise multiple scattering to realise a miniaturised version of beam-splitters, interferometers and optical cavities for light propagation and lasing. Here instead, we introduce a nanophotonic network built from multiple paths and interference, to control and enhance light-matter interaction via light localisation. The network is built from a mesh of subwavelength waveguides, and can sustain localised modes and mirror-less light trapping stemming from interference over hundreds of nodes. With optical gain, these modes can easily lase, reaching ~100 pm linewidths. We introduce a graph solution to the Maxwell's equation which describes light on the network, and predicts lasing action. In this framework, the network optical modes can be designed via the network connectivity and topology, and lasing can be tailored and enhanced by the network shape. Nanophotonic networks pave the way for new laser device architectures, which can be used for sensitive biosensing and on-chip optical information processing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.