Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30643730›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2019

In Situ Investigation of Interrelationships Between Morphology and Biomechanics of Endothelial and Glial Cells and their Nuclei.

Gonzalo Rosso, Ivan Liashkovich, Victor Shahin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Material-Induced Nuclear Deformation Controls Chromatin Architecture in Adipose Stem Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Multiscale Mechanobiology in Brain Physiology and Diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Nuclear Envelope Permeability Barrier as a Fast-Response Intracellular Mechanostat.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gonzalo RossoBiotechnology Center Technische Universität Dresden Tatzberg 47/49 01307 Dresden Germany.
Ivan LiashkovichInstitute of Physiology II University of Münster Robert-Koch Str. 27b 48149 Münster Germany.
Victor ShahinInstitute of Physiology II University of Münster Robert-Koch Str. 27b 48149 Münster Germany.
University of Münster · DETU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphology and biomechanics of cells and nuclei are interlinked with one another and play key roles in fundamental physiological processes. While powerful approaches are available for performing separate morphological and biomechanical investigations on cells and nuclei, simultaneous investigations in situ are challenging. Here, an appropriate approach is presented based on the simultaneous combination of atomic force microscopy and confocal microscopy in situ. Two cell types with entirely different morphologies, physiological roles, and biomechanical environments are investigated: vascular endothelial cells (ECs) with dense cytoskeletal actin, and nervous system glial cells (Schwann cells (SCs)) with dense vimentin network. Results reveal that ECs and their nuclei show high pliability and tend to undergo deformation only at compression sites. SCs, in contrast, show greater ability to resist mechanical deformation. Likewise, SC nuclei are harder to deform than EC nuclei, despite that SC nuclei have significantly lower amounts of lamins A/C, which reportedly scale with nuclear stiffness. The morphology-biomechanics interrelationships in SCs, ECs, and their nuclei may be a key factor in ensuring their physiological functions. In adult SCs, mechanosensitivity is presumably traded for mechanical strength to protect the neurons they encase, whereas ECs maintain mechanosensitivity to ensure specific local physiological response to mechanical stimuli.

Indexed as

atomic force microscopycell mechanicsendothelial cellsnanotechnologySchwann cells

Identifiers

PMID30643730
PMCPMC6325600
OpenAlexW2899943566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.