Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30643683›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Climatic niche evolution in the viviparous

Norberto Martínez-Méndez, Omar Mejía, Jorge Ortega, Fausto Méndez-de la Cruz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Norberto Martínez-MéndezDepartamento de Zoología, Laboratorio de Bioconservación y Manejo, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, México.
Omar MejíaDepartamento de Zoología, Laboratorio de Variación y Evolución, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-7021-8377
Jorge OrtegaDepartamento de Zoología, Laboratorio de Bioconservación y Manejo, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0003-1132-1910
Fausto Méndez-de la CruzDepartamento de Zoología, Laboratorio de Herpetología, Instituto de Biología de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-5084-1276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cold-climate hypothesis maintains that viviparity arose as a means to prevent increased egg mortality in nests owing to low temperatures, and this hypothesis represents the primary and most strongly supported explanation for the evolution of viviparity in reptiles. In this regard, certain authors have stated that viviparous species will exhibit speciation via climatic niche conservatism, with similar climatic niches being observed in allopatric sister species. However, this prediction remains to be tested with bioclimatic variables relevant to each viviparous group. In the present study, we examined climatic niche evolution in a group of North American viviparous lizards to determine whether their diversification is linked to phylogenetic niche conservatism (PNC). We evaluated the phylogenetic signal and trait evolution of individual bioclimatic variables and principal component (PC) scores of a PC analysis, along with reconstructions of ancestral climate tolerances. The results suggest that diversification of the

Indexed as

Cold-climate hypothesisNiche disparity through timeNiche evolutionNorth AmericaPhyloclimatic analysisPhylogenetic niche conservatismPhylogenetic signalPhylogenySceloporusViviparity

Identifiers

PMID30643683
PMCPMC6330044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.