Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30643640›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology open

Lung cancer screening in a community setting: Characteristics, motivations, and attitudes of individuals being screened.

Margaret M Byrne, Sarah E Lillie, Jamie L Studts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lung cancer screening: targeting the hard to reach-a review.Translational lung cancer research · 2021
    Review
  9. Understanding the decision to screen for lung cancer or not: A qualitative analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margaret M ByrneMoffitt Cancer Center, USA.
Sarah E LillieMinneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, USA.
Jamie L StudtsUniversity of Kentucky, USA.

Funding

Resource and QOL Consequences of Lung Cancer ScreeningK07CA101812 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BYRNE, MARGARET M. · 2003 to 2007
$649k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA101812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the characteristics of individuals being screened in community settings including factors influencing screening decisions and the level of information sought prior to screening. Individuals from two community-based radiology clinics (

Indexed as

decision-makingearly adoptioninformationlow-dose computed tomographylung cancer screening

Identifiers

PMID30643640
PMCPMC6322099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.