Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30643599›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2019

Integration of Entrustable Professional Activities with the Milestones for Emergency Medicine Residents.

Danielle Hart, Douglas Franzen, Michael Beeson, Rahul Bhat, Miriam Kulkarni, Lorraine Thibodeau, Moshe Weizberg, Susan Promes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Metrics of Resident Achievement for Defining Program Aims.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Entrustable professional activities in nursing: A concept analysis.International journal of nursing sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danielle HartHennepin County Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Douglas FranzenUniversity of Washington, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Michael BeesonAkron General, Department of Emergency Medicine, Akron, Ohio.
Rahul BhatMedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington Hospital Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia.
Miriam KulkarniSt John's Riverside Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonkers, New York.
Lorraine ThibodeauAlbany Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Albany, New York.
Moshe WeizbergNorthwell Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York City, New York.
Susan PromesPenn State Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedical education is moving toward a competency-based framework with a focus on assessment using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones. Assessment of individual competencies through milestones can be challenging. While competencies describe characteristics of the person, the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) concept refers to work-related activities. EPAs would not replace the milestones but would be linked to them, integrating these frameworks. Many core specialties have already defined EPAs for resident trainees, but EPAs have not yet been created for emergency medicine (EM). This paper describes the development of milestone-linked EPAs for EM.

methodsTen EM educators from across North America formed a consensus working group to draft EM EPAs, using a modified Glaser state-of-the-art approach. A reactor panel with EPA experts from the United States, Canada and the Netherlands was created, and an iterative process with multiple revisions was performed based on reactor panel input. Following this, the EPAs were sent to the Council of Residency Directors for EM (CORD-EM) listserv for additional feedback.

resultsThe product was 11 core EPAs that every trainee from every EM program should be able to perform independently by the time of graduation. Each EPA has associated knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviors (KSAB), which are either milestones themselves or KSABs linked to individual milestones. We recognize that individual programs may have additional focus areas or work-based activities they want their trainees to achieve by graduation; therefore, programs are also encouraged to create additional program-specific EPAs.

conclusionThis set of 11 core, EM-resident EPAs can be used as an assessment tool by EM residency programs, allowing supervising physicians to document the multiple entrustment decisions they are already making during clinical shifts with trainees. The KSAB list within each EPA could assist supervisors in giving specific, actionable feedback to trainees and allow trainees to use this list as an assessment-for-learning tool. Linking each KSAB to individual EM milestones allows EPAs to directly inform milestone assessment for clinical competency committees. These EPAs serve as another option for workplace-based assessment, and are linked to the milestones to create an integrated framework.

Indexed as

Competency-Based EducationInternship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceDelivery of Health CareEmergency MedicineHumansTrustUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30643599
PMCPMC6324698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.