Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30643480›Full record

ReviewSubstance abuse and rehabilitation2019

The association between perceived stigma and substance use disorder treatment outcomes: a review.

Kathleen A Crapanzano, Rebecca Hammarlund, Bilal Ahmad, Natalie Hunsinger, Rumneet Kullar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06119503 (Peer Delivered Episodic Future Thinking to Improve MOUD Treatment Engagement Among Returning Citizens - A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 126 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06119503 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Peer Delivered Episodic Future Thinking to Improve MOUD Treatment Engagement Among Returning Citizens - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry Ford Health SystemRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsBehavior, HealthArmsElongating Time HOrizons for Reentry (ETHoR), Standardized Episodic Thinking (SET)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathleen A CrapanzanoDepartment of Psychiatry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, Kcrap1@lsuhsc.edu.
Rebecca HammarlundOur Lady of the Lake Division of Academic Affairs, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Bilal AhmadDepartment of Psychiatry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, Kcrap1@lsuhsc.edu.
Natalie HunsingerDepartment of Psychiatry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, Kcrap1@lsuhsc.edu.
Rumneet KullarDepartment of Psychiatry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, Kcrap1@lsuhsc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUDs) take a heavy toll on those who have them and on society more broadly. These disorders are often difficult to treat, and relapse is common. Perhaps, because of these factors, these disorders are highly stigmatized worldwide. The purpose of this study is to examine empirical work intended to determine the impact of perceived social stigma and self-stigma on the process of recovering from SUDs with the assistance of formal treatment services. Qualitative studies confirmed that stigma experiences are common among those with these disorders and that these experiences can negatively impact feelings and beliefs about treatment. One quantitative study provided good statistical support for a direct effect of stigma on outcomes, but this was contradicted by other longitudinal data. In general, quantitative articles suggested an indirect effect of stigma on treatment outcomes, via negative emotions and cognitive mechanisms such as feelings of self-efficacy. However, it was notable that there was little consistency in the literature as to definitions and measurement of the constructs of recovery, perceived social stigma, and self-stigma. Future work should focus on bringing clarity, and validated measures, to this problem in order to better determine the nature of these relationships.

Indexed as

perceived social stigmaself-stigmasubstance use disorderstreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID30643480
PMCPMC6311321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.