Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30643465›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2019

Helical tomotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal metastases.

Sanziana Ri Schiopu, Gregor Habl, Matthias Haefner, Sonja Katayama, Klaus Herfarth, Juergen Debus, Florian Sterzing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal disease: past, present, and future.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Tomotherapy for cranio-spinal irradiation.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sanziana Ri SchiopuDepartment of Internal Medicine V, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany, schiopu_s@yahoo.com.
Gregor HablDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Matthias HaefnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, schiopu_s@yahoo.com.
Sonja KatayamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, schiopu_s@yahoo.com.
Klaus HerfarthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, schiopu_s@yahoo.com.
Juergen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, schiopu_s@yahoo.com.
Florian SterzingClinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DETUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLeptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is an increasingly common complication of late-stage systemic cancer, for which there is no standard treatment. We analyzed outcome and toxicity in patients with LM undergoing craniospinal irradiation via helical tomotherapy (HT-CSI) at our institution. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe charts of 15 patients diagnosed with LM and undergoing HT-CSI between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively assessed. Main neoplasms included breast cancer, lung cancer, and lymphoma. All patients presented with cranial neuropathy due to LM. Follow-up was performed regularly. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were tested using the COX-regression model.

resultsMedian survival by cancer type was 6 (breast cancer), 1 (lung cancer), and 2 months (lymphoma), respectively. Median overall survival and relapse-free survival were calculated to be between 2 and 3 months. Six- and 12-month survival was 30% (95% CI 0.08-0.5) and 20% (95% CI 0.05-0.4), respectively. Symptom palliation occurred in 53% of patients in general, but in 67% of breast cancer patients, in particular. Patients with lung cancer experienced no improvement. Most common acute treatment-related toxicity at different levels were hematological toxicity, multiple cranial neuropathy, fatigue, infections, nausea, and headache.

conclusionHT-CSI can help meet the challenge of treating patients with LM, especially because it can palliate symptoms and improve neurological functions. One-year survival remains as disappointing as before.

Indexed as

breast cancercraniospinal irradiationneoplastic meningitispalliative careradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30643465
PMCPMC6317467
OpenAlexW2906718570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.