Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30643463›Full record

ReviewCancer management and research2019

Biliary tract cancer: current challenges and future prospects.

Michele Ghidini, Claudio Pizzo, Andrea Botticelli, Jens Claus Hahne, Rodolfo Passalacqua, Gianluca Tomasello, Fausto Petrelli

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04656249 (The Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04656249 phase2completednot on this map

The Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled46ConditionsCholangiocarcinoma, Biliary Tract Cancer, Targeted TherapyArmsLenvatinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Beyond the stomach: the association betweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  11. New perspectives in biliary tract cancers.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele GhidiniDepartment of Oncology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Claudio PizzoDepartment of Oncology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Andrea BotticelliDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Jens Claus HahneDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
Rodolfo PassalacquaDepartment of Oncology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Gianluca TomaselloDepartment of Oncology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Fausto PetrelliDepartment of Oncology, Operative Unit of Oncology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale of Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy, faupe@libero.it.
Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana · ITCTO Andrea Alesini · ITInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncidence and mortality of biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) are increasing, especially in South America and Asia. Such a disease often bears a dismal prognosis because of diagnosis occurring at late stages and for the frequent relapses after surgery. The aims of this review were to summarize the state of the art of the treatment of BTC and give a view at possible future prospects linked with molecular profiling, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies.

designWe conducted a systematic literature search using MEDLINE and the 2018 ASCO Meeting abstract databases to identify published clinical trials, translational series, and meeting abstracts. All significant papers and abstracts available to date were included.

resultsFor resected BTC, thanks to the BILCAP study, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with capecitabine should be regarded as the new standard of care. For locally advanced inoperable and metastatic diseases, the use of chemoradiotherapy and radioembolization has not been supported by any randomized Phase III study. The standard of care remains the combination of CT with gemcitabine and cisplatin, as reported by the ABC-02 trial. All targeted therapies have failed to improve the survival outcomes, either in combination with CT or as single agents and are not recommended in the treatment of BTC. Whole-exome sequencing and molecular profiling have helped in identifying genetic signatures typical of different BTC subtypes. With this support, new trials with targeted agents and immunotherapy have been designed, and results are awaited.

conclusionBTC still remains a disease with very few treatment options. Different BTC subtypes own peculiar gene mutations and pathways alterations. Therefore, molecular profiling may be the only key to enable new tailored strategies with targeted agents and immunotherapy.

Indexed as

adjuvant treatmentcholangiocarcinomafirst-line treatmentmolecular profilingsurgerytargeted therapies

Identifiers

PMID30643463
PMCPMC6314055
OpenAlexW2908115090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.