ReviewCancer management and research2019
Biliary tract cancer: current challenges and future prospects.
Review in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04656249 (The Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer.ESMO open · 2024Guideline
- Prognostic and Clinical Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Biliary Tract Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of immunology research · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Brightline-2: a phase IIa/IIb trial of brigimadlin (BI 907828) in advanced biliary tract cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or other solid tumors.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Trial
- Translational and Implementation Barrier in the Management of Biliary Tract Cancer: Diagnostic, Molecular, Therapeutic, and Patient-Centered Challenges.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Review
- Actionable genomic landscape of biliary tract cancer in the Indian population.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Exosome-Based Liquid Biopsy in Biliary Tract Cancer: Nanotechnology-Enabled Strategies and Future Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Prognostic Role of Circulating DNA in Biliary Tract Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Beyond the stomach: the association betweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- New perspectives in biliary tract cancers.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Incidence and Long-Term Outcomes of Biliary Tract Cancers in Olmsted County, Minnesota from 1976 to 2018.Cancers · 2024Article
- Remarkable response to capmatinib in a patient with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboringInternational cancer conference journal · 2024Article
- Multi-Disciplinary Care of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Review of Guidelines and Recent Advancements.Cancers · 2023Review
- A Systematised Literature Review of Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer.Targeted oncology · 2023Review
- Brain Metastases from Biliary Tract Cancer: Case Series and Clinicogenomic Analysis.The oncologist · 2023Article
- Evolution of the Targeted Therapy Landscape for Cholangiocarcinoma: Is Cholangiocarcinoma the 'NSCLC' of GI Oncology?Cancers · 2023Review
- Prognostic influence for hilar cholangiocarcinoma and comparisons of prognostic values of Mayo staging and TNM staging systems.Medicine · 2022Article
- The role of insulin and incretin-based drugs in biliary tract cancer: epidemiological and experimental evidence.Discover oncology · 2022Review
- Advances in the systemic treatment of therapeutic approaches in biliary tract cancer.ESMO open · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIncidence and mortality of biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) are increasing, especially in South America and Asia. Such a disease often bears a dismal prognosis because of diagnosis occurring at late stages and for the frequent relapses after surgery. The aims of this review were to summarize the state of the art of the treatment of BTC and give a view at possible future prospects linked with molecular profiling, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies.
designWe conducted a systematic literature search using MEDLINE and the 2018 ASCO Meeting abstract databases to identify published clinical trials, translational series, and meeting abstracts. All significant papers and abstracts available to date were included.
resultsFor resected BTC, thanks to the BILCAP study, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with capecitabine should be regarded as the new standard of care. For locally advanced inoperable and metastatic diseases, the use of chemoradiotherapy and radioembolization has not been supported by any randomized Phase III study. The standard of care remains the combination of CT with gemcitabine and cisplatin, as reported by the ABC-02 trial. All targeted therapies have failed to improve the survival outcomes, either in combination with CT or as single agents and are not recommended in the treatment of BTC. Whole-exome sequencing and molecular profiling have helped in identifying genetic signatures typical of different BTC subtypes. With this support, new trials with targeted agents and immunotherapy have been designed, and results are awaited.
conclusionBTC still remains a disease with very few treatment options. Different BTC subtypes own peculiar gene mutations and pathways alterations. Therefore, molecular profiling may be the only key to enable new tailored strategies with targeted agents and immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.