Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30643457›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2019

Long-term survival after percutaneous irreversible electroporation of inoperable colorectal liver metastases.

Andreas Schicho, Christoph Niessen, Michael Haimerl, Isabel Wiesinger, Christian Stroszczynski, Lukas P Beyer, Philipp Wiggermann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Contemporary evidence on colorectal liver metastases ablation: toward a paradigm shift in locoregional treatment.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas SchichoDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, andreas.schicho@ukr.de.
Christoph NiessenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, andreas.schicho@ukr.de.
Michael HaimerlDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, andreas.schicho@ukr.de.
Isabel WiesingerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, andreas.schicho@ukr.de.
Christian StroszczynskiDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, andreas.schicho@ukr.de.
Lukas P BeyerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, andreas.schicho@ukr.de.
Philipp WiggermannDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DEKlinikum Braunschweig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) that are not amenable to surgery or thermal ablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel local treatment modality and additional option.

methodsThis study is a retrospective long-term follow-up of patients with CRLM who underwent IRE as salvage treatment.

resultsOf the 24 included patients, 18 (75.0%) were male, and the median age was 57 (range: 28-75) years. The mean time elapsed from diagnosis to IRE was 37.9±37.3 months. Mean overall survival was 26.5 months after IRE (range: 2.5-69.2 months) and 58.1 months after diagnosis (range: 14.8-180.1 months). One-, three-, and five-year survival rates after initial diagnosis were 100.0%, 79.2%, and 41.2%; after IRE, the respective survival rates were 79.1%, 25.0%, and 8.3%. There were no statistically significant differences detected in survival after IRE with respect to gender, age, T- or N-stage at the time of diagnosis, size of metastases subject to IRE, number of hepatic lesions, or time elapsed between IRE and diagnosis.

conclusionFor nonresectable CRLM, long-term survival data emphasize the value of IRE as a new minimally invasive local therapeutic approach in multimodal palliative treatment, which is currently limited to systemic or regional therapies in this setting.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerCRLMirreversible electroporationliver metastaseslong-termsalvage treatmentsurvival

Identifiers

PMID30643457
PMCPMC6312065
OpenAlexW2905674146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.