Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30643376›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of perinatal education2017

Evaluation of a Patient Education Pamphlet for Women Considering Vaginal Birth After Cesarean.

Sarah Munro, Kathryn Dewar, Elizabeth Wilcox, Michael C Klein, Patricia A Janssen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of perinatal education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah Munro
Kathryn Dewar
Elizabeth Wilcox
Michael C Klein
Patricia A Janssen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated a patient education pamphlet on vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Focus groups with 17 women in 4 communities involved a 5-item knowledge pretest and question on intention to plan VBAC, reading the pamphlet, a knowledge posttest, and a moderated discussion. Forming a preference for birth after cesarean was characterized by (a) consolidating information from social sources, (b) seeking certainty in your next birth, and (c) questioning your ability to have a vaginal birth. Participants preferred vaginal birth, but all feared the uncertainty of labor. Knowledge scores increased for all participants, but intentions to plan a VBAC did not change. Our findings may encourage the development of interventions to reduce women's fear of vaginal birth.

Indexed as

focus groupspatient educationqualitativerepeat cesarean surgeryvaginal birth after cesarean

Identifiers

PMID30643376
PMCPMC6314323
OpenAlexW2596162390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.