Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30643192›Full record

ArticleOncogene2019

Circulating cell-free DNA in breast cancer: size profiling, levels, and methylation patterns lead to prognostic and predictive classifiers.

Maria Panagopoulou, Makrina Karaglani, Ioanna Balgkouranidou, Eirini Biziota, Triantafillia Koukaki, Evaggelos Karamitrousis, Evangelia Nena, Ioannis Tsamardinos, George Kolios, Evi Lianidou and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria PanagopoulouLaboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.
Makrina KaraglaniLaboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.
Ioanna BalgkouranidouLaboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.
Eirini BiziotaDepartment of Oncology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.
Triantafillia KoukakiDepartment of Oncology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.
Evaggelos KaramitrousisDepartment of Oncology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.
Evangelia NenaLaboratory of Hygiene and Environmental Protection, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.
Ioannis TsamardinosDepartment of Computer Science, University of Crete, Voutes, Greece.
George KoliosLaboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-4782
Evi LianidouAnalysis of Circulating Tumor Cells, Lab of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Stylianos KakolyrisDepartment of Oncology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece.
Ekaterini ChatzakiLaboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece. achatzak@med.duth.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-4257
Democritus University of Thrace · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of Crete · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) is a suggested biosource of valuable clinical information for cancer, meeting the need for a minimally-invasive advancement in the route of precision medicine. In this paper, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive potential of ccfDNA parameters in early and advanced breast cancer. Groups consisted of 150 and 16 breast cancer patients under adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy respectively, 34 patients with metastatic disease and 35 healthy volunteers. Direct quantification of ccfDNA in plasma revealed elevated concentrations correlated to the incidence of death, shorter PFS, and non-response to pharmacotherapy in the metastatic but not in the other groups. The methylation status of a panel of cancer-related genes chosen based on previous expression and epigenetic data (KLK10, SOX17, WNT5A, MSH2, GATA3) was assessed by quantitative methylation-specific PCR. All but the GATA3 gene was more frequently methylated in all the patient groups than in healthy individuals (all p < 0.05). The methylation of WNT5A was statistically significantly correlated to greater tumor size and poor prognosis characteristics and in advanced stage disease with shorter OS. In the metastatic group, also SOX17 methylation was significantly correlated to the incidence of death, shorter PFS, and OS. KLK10 methylation was significantly correlated to unfavorable clinicopathological characteristics and relapse, whereas in the adjuvant group to shorter DFI. Methylation of at least 3 or 4 genes was significantly correlated to shorter OS and no pharmacotherapy response, respectively. Classification analysis by a fully automated, machine learning software produced a single-parametric linear model using ccfDNA plasma concentration values, with great discriminating power to predict response to chemotherapy (AUC 0.803, 95% CI [0.606, 1.000]) in the metastatic group. Two more multi-parametric signatures were produced for the metastatic group, predicting survival and disease outcome. Finally, a multiple logistic regression model was constructed, discriminating between patient groups and healthy individuals. Overall, ccfDNA emerged as a highly potent predictive classifier in metastatic breast cancer. Upon prospective clinical evaluation, all the signatures produced could aid accurate prognosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreastBreast NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA MethylationDNA, NeoplasmEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansKallikreinsMiddle AgedPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, NeoplasmKallikreins

Identifiers

PMID30643192
OpenAlexW2911211113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.