Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30643179›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

In vivo effects of single or combined topical neuroprotective and regenerative agents on degeneration of retinal ganglion cells in rat optic nerve crush model.

Yuta Kitamura, Guzel Bikbova, Takayuki Baba, Shuichi Yamamoto, Toshiyuki Oshitari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuta KitamuraDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Chiba, Japan.
Guzel BikbovaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Chiba, Japan.
Takayuki BabaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8178-8391
Shuichi YamamotoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Chiba, Japan.
Toshiyuki OshitariDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science Chiba University, Graduate School of Medicine, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Chiba, Japan. Tarii@aol.com.
Chiba University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the effectiveness of a single or a combination of topical neurotrophic factors (NFs) in protecting retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the rat optic nerve crush (ONC) model, the left ONC was performed to induce the death of the RGCs in adult Sprague-Dawley rats. The NFs studied were tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), citicoline, neurotrophin-4 (NT-4), combined TUDCA/citicoline (Doublet-1), combined TUDCA/NT-4 (Doublet-2), combined TUDCA/citicoline/NT-4 (Triplet), and PBS. After 2 weeks, the number of RGCs was determined by Brn3a immunostaining. The optic nerves were immunostained for anti-Growth Associated Protein-43(GAP-43) and -200kD neurofilament heavy antibody to study optic nerve regeneration. Two weeks after the ONC, the densities of RGCs in all treated eyes were significantly higher than that of the PBS treated eyes. In the Triplet group, the number of RGC axons after ONC was significantly higher than that in all of the single treatment groups and the number of TUNEL positive cells was significantly reduced and the number of GAP-43 immunopositive axons was significantly greater than those in the PBS group. Neovascularization was observed only in the Doublet-1 group. We conclude that the combination of the three NFs was the most effective way to protect RGCs after the ONC.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAnimalsCell CountCytidine Diphosphate CholineDisease Models, AnimalDrug Therapy, CombinationHistocytochemistryImmunohistochemistryNerve Growth FactorsNeuroprotective AgentsOptic Nerve InjuriesRats, Sprague-DawleyRetinal Ganglion CellsTaurochenodeoxycholic AcidTreatment OutcomeCytidine Diphosphate CholineNerve Growth FactorsNeuroprotective Agentsneurotrophin 4Taurochenodeoxycholic Acidursodoxicoltaurine

Identifiers

PMID30643179
PMCPMC6331543
OpenAlexW2911194996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.