ArticleScientific reports2019
Memory effect of arsenic-induced cellular response and its influences on toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticle.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unraveling the role of heavy metals xenobiotics in cancer: a critical review.Discover oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Toxicity of arsenic (As) has been widely characterized. However, few studies focus on whether cell responses induced by As at nontoxic concentration could be inherited and further change cell tolerance to another pollutant. In this study, human A549 and HeLa cells were exposed to As at nontoxic concentrations for 10 or 15 passages, then the cells were recovered in the cell medium without As. At 25th passage, residual As in both type of cells was completely removed through the recovery process. And no abnormity in cell viability was identified in both type of cells between control and As-treated groups. Above results indicated that As exposure-recovery treatment had limited influence on phenotype of the cells. However, gene expression profiles determined by high-throughput sequencing showed that As exposure-recovery treatment induced similar expression modification of genes related to inflammation, oxidative stress and epigenetic modulation in the A549 and HeLa cells after recovery of 10 or 15 passages, indicating that As-induced cellular responses have been partially memorized at transcriptional level. The memory effect might play key roles in increased tolerance of the A549 and HeLa cells to adverse effects (cell viability, intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and plasma membrane damage) induced by titanium dioxide nanoparticles (as representative pollutant). This study shed new lights on toxic effects induced by As at nontoxic concentration, which is useful for risk assessment of combined effects of As and other pollutants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.