Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30642969›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Evolutionary history of Polyneoptera and its implications for our understanding of early winged insects.

Benjamin Wipfler, Harald Letsch, Paul B Frandsen, Paschalia Kapli, Christoph Mayer, Daniela Bartel, Thomas R Buckley, Alexander Donath, Janice S Edgerly-Rooks, Mari Fujita and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Coevolution ofiScience · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Insect Flight: State of the Field and Future Directions.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Benjamin WipflerInstitut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany; benjamin.wipfler@leibniz-zfmk.de sabrina.simon@wur.nl.
Harald LetschDepartment für Botanik und Biodiversitätsforschung, Universität Wien, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Paul B FrandsenDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84604.
Paschalia KapliThe Exelixis Lab, Scientific Computing Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph MayerCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5104-6621
Daniela BartelDepartment of Integrative Zoology, Universität Wien, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Thomas R BuckleyNew Zealand Arthropod Collection, Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Alexander DonathCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5618-0547
Janice S Edgerly-RooksDepartment of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA 95053.
Mari FujitaSugadaira Research Station, Mountain Science Center, University of Tsukuba, Sugadaira Kogen, Ueda, Nagano 386-2204, Japan.
Shanlin LiuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Ryuichiro MachidaSugadaira Research Station, Mountain Science Center, University of Tsukuba, Sugadaira Kogen, Ueda, Nagano 386-2204, Japan.
Yuta MashimoSugadaira Research Station, Mountain Science Center, University of Tsukuba, Sugadaira Kogen, Ueda, Nagano 386-2204, Japan.
Bernhard MisofCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Oliver NiehuisEvolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute of Biology I (Zoology), Albert Ludwig University, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Ralph S PetersCenter of Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Malte PetersenCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7601-9873
Lars PodsiadlowskiCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Kai SchütteTierökologie und Naturschutz, Universität Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Shota ShimizuSugadaira Research Station, Mountain Science Center, University of Tsukuba, Sugadaira Kogen, Ueda, Nagano 386-2204, Japan.
Toshiki UchifuneSugadaira Research Station, Mountain Science Center, University of Tsukuba, Sugadaira Kogen, Ueda, Nagano 386-2204, Japan.
Jeanne WilbrandtCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Evgeny YanInstitut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany.
Xin ZhouDepartment of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Sabrina SimonBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands benjamin.wipfler@leibniz-zfmk.de sabrina.simon@wur.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyneoptera represents one of the major lineages of winged insects, comprising around 40,000 extant species in 10 traditional orders, including grasshoppers, roaches, and stoneflies. Many important aspects of polyneopteran evolution, such as their phylogenetic relationships, changes in their external appearance, their habitat preferences, and social behavior, are unresolved and are a major enigma in entomology. These ambiguities also have direct consequences for our understanding of the evolution of winged insects in general; for example, with respect to the ancestral habitats of adults and juveniles. We addressed these issues with a large-scale phylogenomic analysis and used the reconstructed phylogenetic relationships to trace the evolution of 112 characters associated with the external appearance and the lifestyle of winged insects. Our inferences suggest that the last common ancestors of Polyneoptera and of the winged insects were terrestrial throughout their lives, implying that wings did not evolve in an aquatic environment. The appearance of the first polyneopteran insect was mainly characterized by ancestral traits such as long segmented abdominal appendages and biting mouthparts held below the head capsule. This ancestor lived in association with the ground, which led to various specializations including hardened forewings and unique tarsal attachment structures. However, within Polyneoptera, several groups switched separately to a life on plants. In contrast to a previous hypothesis, we found that social behavior was not part of the polyneopteran ground plan. In other traits, such as the biting mouthparts, Polyneoptera shows a high degree of evolutionary conservatism unique among the major lineages of winged insects.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsInsectaNeopteraPhylogenyWings, Animallower winged insectsNeopteraphylogenomicsPolyneopteraPterygota

Identifiers

PMID30642969
PMCPMC6386694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.