ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2019
Developing a Conversation Aid to Support Shared Decision Making: Reflections on Designing Anticoagulation Choice.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Shared Decision Making Tools for People Facing Stroke Prevention Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Environmental Scan.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021Pooled it
- The impact of adding cost information to a conversation aid to support shared decision making about low-risk prostate cancer treatment: Results of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Trial
- Making sense of diabetes medication decisions: a mixed methods cluster randomized trial using a conversation aid intervention.Endocrine · 2022Trial
- Effect of Shared Decision-Making for Stroke Prevention on Treatment Adherence and Safety Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Trial
- Cost Conversations About Anticoagulation Between Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Their Clinicians: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Assessment of Shared Decision-making for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Patient perspectives on atrial fibrillation management and pharmacist roles in outpatient clinics: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Encounter tool for Shared Decision Making about Adjuvant Treatment of Lung Cancer: Randomized Clinical Trial.Research square · 2026Article
- Shared Decision-Making Aid for Stroke-Prevention Strategies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis (SIMPLIFY-HD): A Mixed-Methods Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary Approach in Atrial Fibrillation: As Good as Gold.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Patient-centered clinical decision support challenges and opportunities identified from workflow execution models.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Characterizing atrial fibrillation symptom improvement following de novo catheter ablation.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2024Article
- Estimating Vitamin K Antagonist Anticoagulation Benefit in People With Atrial Fibrillation Accounting for Competing Risks: Evidence From 12 Randomized Trials.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024Article
- Ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous thrombin injection for stoma-site bleeding after PEG tube insertion: a case series and review of the literature.CVIR endovascular · 2024Article
- Shared decision-making as a method of care.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2023Article
- Patient feedback receiving care using a shared decision making tool for thyroid nodule evaluation-an observational study.Endocrine · 2023Observational
- The design and development of an encounter tool to support shared decision making about preventing cardiovascular events.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Shared Decision-Making for Drug-Drug Interactions: Formative Evaluation of an Anticoagulant Drug Interaction.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Reimagining care for young adults living with type 1 diabetes.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-centered care requires that treatments respond to the problematic situation of each patient in a manner that makes intellectual, emotional, and practical sense, an achievement that requires shared decision making (SDM). To implement SDM in practice, tools-sometimes called conversation aids or decision aids-are prepared by collating, curating, and presenting high-quality, comprehensive, and up-to-date evidence. Yet, the literature offers limited guidance for how to make evidence support SDM. Herein, we describe our approach and the challenges encountered during the development of Anticoagulation Choice, a conversation aid to help patients with atrial fibrillation and their clinicians jointly consider the risk of thromboembolic stroke and decide whether and how to respond to this risk with anticoagulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.