Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30642382›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2019

Using Concept Maps to compare obesity knowledge between policy makers and primary care researchers in Canada.

Elizabeth Sturgiss, Thea Luig, Denise L Campbell-Scherer, Richard Lewanczuk, Lee A Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth SturgissEpidemiology for Policy and Practice Group, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, The Australian National University, 62 Mills Road, Acton, ACT, 2601, Australia. liz.sturgiss@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4428-4060
Thea LuigDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Denise L Campbell-SchererDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Richard LewanczukDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.
Lee A GreenDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.

Funding

University of Alberta Northern Alberta Academic Family Medicine Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveKnowledge transfer is the process of information sharing between researchers, knowledge users and policy makers. Globally, public policies about obesity do not reflect the complexity of what is known about the cause and effects of obesity. We used Concept Maps, a qualitative method that represents mental models, to compare the understanding of obesity between policy makers in a Canadian province and local primary care researchers. Eight participants were interviewed during which a Concept Map was developed using "C-map Tools" software. Maps were then colour-coded to identify themes and concepts in the maps. Finally, the team synthesised the findings from each of the maps and presented them back to each of the participants.

resultsAll participants had mental models with rich details on the complexity of obesity for individuals, community, and at the policy level. Clinician-researchers had more focus on medical management than policy makers although most participants lacked concepts on the role of primary care in obesity management. A shared understanding of obesity could assist researchers and policy makers in developing a relevant and effective strategy. Concept Mapping provides a novel and creative way to visually compare different understandings of health-related topics.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PolicyHealth Services ResearchObesityPrimary Health CareResearch PersonnelAdultCanadaHumansTranslational Research, BiomedicalCanadaHealth policyKnowledge translationObesityPrimary careResearch

Identifiers

PMID30642382
PMCPMC6332696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.