ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2019
Assessing the quality of life among Pakistani general population and their associated factors by using the World Health Organization's quality of life instrument (WHOQOL-BREF): a population based cross-sectional study.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quality of life in people with transsexuality after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Pooled it
- Structural heat adaptation and education in a rural setting of Pakistan: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2026Trial
- New Path to Recovery and Well-Being: Cross-Sectional Study on WeChat Use and Endorsement of WeChat-Based mHealth Among People Living With Schizophrenia in China.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Structural heat adaptation and education in urban settings (SHAPES trial): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting Quality of Life of Thai Cervical Cancer Patients.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026Article
- Non-communicable diseases, psychosocial wellbeing, and quality of life in Ga Mashie, Accra, Ghana: analysis from a community-based cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Sociocultural determinants of health-associated quality of life among Afghan refugees in Pakistan: evidence from a multi-stage cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The human cost of Type-2 diabetes mellitus: Uncovering the hidden burden on quality of life.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Quality of life among healthcare workers in the hospitals and primary healthcare centers in Gaza Strip: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Article
- Health, social, behavioral, and labor correlates of quality of life in a well population: a contribution to construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF.Cadernos de saude publica · 2025Article
- Public mental health services in Southern China and related health outcomes among individuals living with severe mental illness.Global health research and policy · 2024Article
- Determining the factors impacting the quality of life among the general population in coastal communities in central Vietnam.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Quality of Life and Its Biopsychosocial Determinants: A Study Among the Yadav Community From Delhi, India.Cureus · 2024Article
- Medication adherence and quality of life among geriatric patients: Insights from a hospital-based cross-sectional study in India.PloS one · 2024Article
- Quality of life in the general population of Mongolia: Normative data on WHOQOL-BREF.PloS one · 2023Article
- Quality of Life of Cancer Patients during Chemotherapy in Indonesia: A Comparison of EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L, Based on Patients' Characteristics.International journal of clinical practice · 2023Article
- Assessment of the components of sarcopenia and quality of life perceived of individuals on hemodialysis.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023Article
- Quality of Life and Associated Factors of International Students in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the WHOQOL-BREF Instrument.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Identifying the Psychometric Properties of the Malay Version of the WHOQOL-BREF among Employees with Obesity Problem.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeasuring quality of life (QOL) in a population is important for the predictions of health and social care needs. In Pakistan, health related quality of life data exist but there are no quality of life data of general population. In this study, quality of life was assessed among the Pakistani general population and their associated factors by using the World Health Organization's quality of life instrument (WHOQOL-BREF). METHODOLOGY: A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out in all 52 Union Councils of District Abbottabad, Khaber Pkutunkhua province, Pakistan from March 2015 to August 2015. Multi-stage cluster sampling technique was employed in this study. Quality of life was measured by using the validated WHOQOL-BREF instrument, along with socioeconomic, demographic, and World Bank social capital questions in this population- based study. The data were collected through households, utilizing face to face interviews. The association between socio-demographic variables and quality of life domains were determined by using both univariate and multivariate analysis. Descriptive statistics were derived, and a multilevel linear regression using backward analysis allowing to obtain final model for each domain was achieved to recognize the variables that affect quality of life score.
resultsA total of 2063 participants were included in this study (51.2% male, 48.2% female). Mean age of participants was 37.9, SD = 13.2; ranging from 18 to 90. Mean score of quality of life domains (physical, psychological, social relationship and environmental domains) were 65.0 (SD = 15.2), 67.4 (SD = 15.0), 72.0 (SD = 16.5), 55.5 (SD = 15.0), respectively. Overall, socioeconomic status was established to be the strongest predictor of poorer quality of life for all domains as a change in SES from high to low results in reduction about (β = - 5.85, β = - 9.03, β = - 8.33, β = - 9.98, p < 0.001). Similarly, type of residency was negatively associated with physical, psychological and environmental domains while age and sex were negatively associated with physical, psychological and relationship domains in final model. Furthermore social capital (β = 0.09, β = 0.13, β =0.14, β =0.15, p < 0.001) had a positive effect on Pakistani quality of life. Overall, subjective quality of life was found to be low in our population and extremely varied by socio-demographic variables.
conclusionsIncreasing age, having average and lower socioeconomic status and living in the rural area were found to be the strong predictor of poorer quality of life in all domains, while total social capital score had a positive effect on Pakistani quality of life scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.