Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30642358›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2019

Novel methods of qualitative analysis for health policy research.

Mireya Martínez-García, Maite Vallejo, Enrique Hernández-Lemus, Jorge Alberto Álvarez-Díaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mireya Martínez-GarcíaSociomedical Research Department, National Institute of Cardiology, Juan Badiano 1, Mexico City, 14080, Mexico. mireya.martinez@cardiologia.org.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2876-8500
Maite VallejoSociomedical Research Department, National Institute of Cardiology, Juan Badiano 1, Mexico City, 14080, Mexico.
Enrique Hernández-LemusComputational Genomics Division, National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Periférico Sur 4809, Mexico City, 14610, Mexico.
Jorge Alberto Álvarez-DíazMedical School, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Calzada del Hueso 1100, Mexico City, 04960, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, thanks to the growing number of public database resources, most evidence on planning and management, healthcare institutions, policies and practices is becoming available to everyone. However, one of the limitations for the advancement of data and literature-driven research has been the lack of flexibility of the methodological resources used in qualitative research. There is a need to incorporate friendly, cheaper and faster tools for the systematic, unbiased analysis of large data corpora, in particular regarding the qualitative aspects of the information (often overlooked).

methodsThis article proposes a series of novel techniques, exemplified by the case of the role of Institutional Committees of Bioethics to (1) massively identify the documents relevant to a given issue, (2) extract the fundamental content, focusing on qualitative analysis, (3) synthesize the findings in the published literature, (4) categorize and visualize the evidence, and (5) analyse and report the results.

resultsA critical study of the institutional role of public health policies and practices in Institutional Committees of Bioethics was used as an example application of the method. Interactive strategies were helpful to define and conceptualise variables, propose research questions and refine research interpretation. These methods are additional aids to systematic reviews, pre-coding schemes and construction of a priori diagrams to survey and analyse social science literature.

conclusionsThese novel methods have proven to facilitate the formulation and testing of hypotheses on the subjects to be studied. Such tools may allow important advances going from descriptive approaches to decision-making and even institutional assessment and policy redesign, by pragmatic reason of time and costs.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PolicyResearchResearch DesignBioethicsData AnalysisDecision MakingHumansInformation DisseminationPublic HealthQualitative ResearchSocial SciencesAlgorithmsComplex networksData miningHealthcare economics and organisationsHealth policySocial control policies

Identifiers

PMID30642358
PMCPMC6332644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.