Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30642336›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2019

Evaluation of scFv protein recovery from E. coli by in vitro refolding and mild solubilization process.

Animesh Sarker, Abhishek Singh Rathore, Rinkoo Devi Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Glypican-3-targeted bioconjugates for hepatocellular carcinoma: design, engineering, and translational applications.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dopamine DBiomolecules · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Animesh SarkerFaculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, South Asian University, New Delhi, India.
Abhishek Singh RathoreFaculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, South Asian University, New Delhi, India.
Rinkoo Devi GuptaFaculty of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, South Asian University, New Delhi, India. rdgupta@sau.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-9596

Funding

South Asian University Start-up fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe production of therapeutically active single chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody is still challenging in E. coli due to the aggregation propensity of recombinant protein into inclusion bodies (IBs). However, recent advancement of biotechnology has shown substantial recovery of bioactive protein from such insoluble IBs by solubilization and refolding processes. In addition, gene fusion technology has also widely been used to improve the soluble protein production using E. coli. This study demonstrates that mild-solubilization and in vitro refolding strategies, both are capable to recover soluble scFv protein from bacterial IBs, although the degree of success is greatly influenced by different fusion tags with the target protein.

resultsIt was observed that the most commonly used fusion tag, i.e., maltose binding protein (MBP) was not only influenced the cytoplasmic expression in E. coli but also greatly improved the in vitro refolding yield of scFv protein. On the other hand, mild solubilization process potentially could recover soluble and functional scFv protein from non-classical IBs without assistance of any fusion tag and in vitro refolding step. The recovery yield achieved by mild solubilization process was also found higher than denaturation-refolding method except while scFv was refolded in fusion with MBP tag. Concomitantly, it was also observed that the soluble protein achieved by mild solubilization process was better structured and functionally more active than the one achieved by in vitro refolding method in the absence of MBP tag or refolding enhancer.

conclusionsMaltose binding protein tagged scFv has shown better refolding and solubility yields as compare to mild solubilization process. However, in terms of cost, time and tag free nature, mild solubilization method for scFv recovery from bacterial IBs is considerable for therapeutic application and further structural studies.

Indexed as

Antigen-Antibody ReactionsCircular DichroismEscherichia coliInclusion BodiesMaltose-Binding ProteinsProtein DenaturationProtein RefoldingRecombinant ProteinsSingle-Chain AntibodiesSolubilityMaltose-Binding ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsSingle-Chain AntibodiesBacterial protein productionInclusion bodiesMild solubilizationRefoldingSingle chain variable fragment

Identifiers

PMID30642336
PMCPMC6330739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.