Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30642311›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2019

Mothers In Motion intervention effect on psychosocial health in young, low-income women with overweight or obesity.

Mei-Wei Chang, Susan Nitzke, Roger Brown

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01839708 (Mothers in Motion Program to Prevent Weight Gain in Overweight/Obese WIC Mothers), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01839708 nacompletednot on this map

Mothers in Motion Program to Prevent Weight Gain in Overweight/Obese WIC Mothers (MIM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State UniversityRan2011 to 2017Enrolled569ConditionsOverweight, ObesityArmsLifestyle Counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Nutrients · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mei-Wei ChangCollege of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 342 Newton Hall, 1585 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. chang.1572@osu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7819-6096
Susan NitzkeDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1415 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Roger BrownSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Mothers in Motion Program to Prevent Weight Gain in Overweight/Obese WIC MothersR18DK083934 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, MEI-WEI · 2011 to 2015
$3.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK083934NIH HHS R18-DK-083934-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMothers in Motion (MIM), a community-based intervention program, was designed to help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity prevent further weight gain by promoting stress management, healthy eating, and physical activity. This paper presents the MIM's intervention effect on self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.

methodsParticipants (N = 612) were recruited from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in Michigan. They were randomly assigned to an intervention group (410 participants) or comparison group (202 participants). During the 16-week intervention, intervention participants watched ten video lessons at home and joined ten peer support group teleconferences. Surveys with established validity and reliability were used to measure self-efficacy to cope with stress, emotional coping response, and social support for stress management. The Perceived Stress Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale were used to measure stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect, respectively. A general linear mixed model was applied to test the intervention effect at the end of the 16-week intervention (T2, n = 338) and at three-month follow-up (T3, n = 311).

resultsAt T2, the intervention group reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (effect size [Cohen's d] = 0.53), better emotional coping response (d = 0.38), less stress (d = 0.34), fewer depressive symptoms (d = - 0.27), and more positive affect (d = 0.31) than the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in social support for stress management and negative affect between these two groups. At T3, the intervention group still reported significantly higher self-efficacy to cope with stress (d = 0.32) and better emotional coping response (d = 0.34) than the comparison group but did not report significantly higher social support for stress management, stress, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect.

conclusionsTo help young, low-income women with overweight or obesity manage stress, researchers and program planners may consider focusing on building self-efficacy to cope with stress.

trial registrationClinical Trials NCT01839708 ; registered February 28, 2013.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalPovertySelf EfficacySocial SupportAdultAffectDepressionExerciseFemaleFood AssistanceHealth PromotionHumansMichiganMothersObesityOverweightDepressive symptomsLow-income womenObesityStress

Identifiers

PMID30642311
PMCPMC6332663
OpenAlexW2946985220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.