Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30642302›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2019

Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study.

Christophe L Bertin, Simon Ponthus, Hari Vivekanantham, Pierre-Alexandre Poletti, Omar Kherad, Olivier T Rutschmann

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02980081 (Abdominal Plain X-ray in the Emergency Departement), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02980081 completednot on this map

Abdominal Plain X-ray in the Emergency Departement: Really Usefull?

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GenevaRan2016 to 2017Enrolled1,997ConditionsEmergencies, Diagnostic Imaging, Abdomen, AcuteArmsabdominal plain x-ray
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Trends in visits, imaging, and diagnosis for emergency department abdominal pain presentations in the United States, 2007-2019.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of abdominal gas by plain abdominal radiographs.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christophe L BertinDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva University, rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 2, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Simon PonthusDivision of Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Hari VivekananthamDivision of Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Pierre-Alexandre PolettiDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva University, rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 2, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Omar KheradDivision of Internal Medicine, Hôpital de la Tour and School of Medicine, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Olivier T RutschmannDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and School of Medicine, Geneva University, rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 2, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland. olivier.rutschmann@hcuge.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6178-3254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlain abdominal radiography (PAR) is routinely performed in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to (1) identify the indications for PAR in EDs and compare them against international guidelines, (2) uncover predictors of non-compliance with guidelines, and (3) describe the use of additional radiological examinations in EDs.

methodsRetrospective cohort study in the EDs of two hospitals in Geneva, Switzerland, including all adult patients who underwent PAR in the EDs. Indications were considered "appropriate" if complying with guidelines. Predictors of non-compliance were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

resultsOver 1 year, PAR was performed in 1997 patients (2.2% of all admissions). Their mean age was 59.7 years, with 53.1% of female patients. The most common indications were constipation (30.8%), suspected ileus (28.9%), and abdominal pain (15.3%). According to the French and American guidelines, only 11.8% of the PARs were indicated, while 46.2% of them complied with the Australian and British guidelines. On multivariate analysis, admission to the private hospital ED (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% CI 1.78-8.45), female gender (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.46-2.59), and an age >  65 years (OR 2.41, 95%CI 1.74-3.32) were associated with a higher risk of inappropriate PAR. Additional radiological examinations were performed in 73.7% of patients.

conclusionsMost indications for PAR did not comply with guidelines and elderly women appeared particularly at risk of being exposed to inappropriate examination. PAR did not prevent the need for additional examinations. Local guidelines should be developed, and initiatives should be implemented to reduce unnecessary PARs.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov , identifier NCT02980081 .

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalEquipment and Supplies UtilizationFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiography, AbdominalRetrospective StudiesSwitzerlandUnnecessary ProceduresAbdomenEmergency departmentPlain X-ray

Identifiers

PMID30642302
PMCPMC6332516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.