ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology2019
Validity of the Verbal Concept Attainment Test in multiple sclerosis.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAs many as 70% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) have clinically significant cognitive impairment, and most of these individuals exhibit executive dysfunction. Most research concerning executive dysfunction in MS has focused upon nonverbal measures. The Verbal Concept Attainment Test (VCAT) has demonstrated construct validity as an executive function measure in people infected with HIV and in people with focal brain lesions, but its validity among people with MS is unknown. The current study evaluated the VCAT's criterion, diagnostic, and ecological validity in people with MS.
methodA comprehensive neuropsychological battery was administered to 44 healthy individuals and 97 people with MS. Based on existing norms, they were classified as impaired or unimpaired, resulting in 65 people with MS categorized as unimpaired and 32 as impaired. They were administered a battery assessing neuropsychological impairment and disability status.
resultsThe VCAT correlated with most measures of neuropsychological function, but its largest correlations occurred with measures of executive function, working memory, and verbal memory. Regarding classification accuracy, the VCAT achieved satisfactory sensitivity and specificity in identifying neuropsychological impairment in people with MS. The VCAT achieved moderate correlations with measures of disability status.
conclusionsThe data provide evidence for an optimal VCAT cutoff score for establishing neuropsychological impairment in people with MS, and they demonstrate that the VCAT possesses acceptable criterion, diagnostic, and ecological validity. As such, these data support the inclusion of the VCAT in research and clinical practice involving people with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.