Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30642103›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Parents' Reports of Preschoolers' Diets: Relative Validity of a Food Frequency Questionnaire and Dietary Patterns.

Liisa Korkalo, Henna Vepsäläinen, Carola Ray, Essi Skaffari, Reetta Lehto, Helena Henrietta Hauta-Alus, Kaija Nissinen, Jelena Meinilä, Eva Roos, Maijaliisa Erkkola

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liisa KorkaloDepartment of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland. liisa.korkalo@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-0525-9877
Henna VepsäläinenDepartment of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland. henna.vepsalainen@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-0177-3609
Carola RayFolkhälsan Research Center, Topeliuksenkatu 20, 00250 Helsinki, Finland. carola.ray@folkhalsan.fi.
Essi SkaffariDepartment of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland. essi.skaffari@helsinki.fi.
Reetta LehtoFolkhälsan Research Center, Topeliuksenkatu 20, 00250 Helsinki, Finland. reetta.lehto@folkhalsan.fi.
Helena Henrietta Hauta-AlusChildren's Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Biomedicum 2 C, P.O. Box 705, 00020 HUS Helsinki, Finland. helena.hauta-alus@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-3487-7834
Kaija NissinenSeinäjoki University of Applied Sciences, Kampusranta 11, 60101 Seinäjoki, Finland. kaija.nissinen@seamk.fi.
Jelena MeiniläFolkhälsan Research Center, Topeliuksenkatu 20, 00250 Helsinki, Finland. jelena.meinila@helsinki.fi.
Eva RoosFolkhälsan Research Center, Topeliuksenkatu 20, 00250 Helsinki, Finland. eva.roos@folkhalsan.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-3521-6517
Maijaliisa ErkkolaDepartment of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland. maijaliisa.erkkola@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-6966-1523

Funding

Academy of Finland 285439Academy of Finland 287288Academy of Finland 288038Finnish Food Research Foundation -Finnish Foundation for Nutrition Research -Folkhälsan Research Center -Helsingin Yliopisto -Juho Vainion Säätiö -Medicinska Understödsföreningen Liv och Hälsa -Opetus- ja Kulttuuriministeriö -Päivikki ja Sakari Sohlbergin Säätiö -Signe ja Ane Gyllenbergin Säätiö -Sosiaali- ja Terveysministeriö -Suomen Kulttuurirahasto -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate assessment of food consumption is crucial in nutritional studies. Since modern nutrition science has become more interested in diet as a whole, studies validating food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) and exploratory dietary patterns are needed. We aimed at examining the relative validity of a 47-item FFQ against three-day food records among three- to six-year-old Finnish children, as well as investigating the consistency of the dietary patterns derived using the principal component analysis (PCA), with food record and FFQ data as inputs. We conducted the PCA without forcing the food record data to match the FFQ items. Altogether, 75% or more of the participants were classified into the same or adjacent quarter of vegetables and fruits as well as sugary food consumption. Furthermore, the intake of folate and vitamin C increased linearly in the quarters of vegetable and fruit consumption, as did the intake of sucrose in quarters of sugary food consumption. Three fairly similar dietary patterns were identified from food records and FFQ data. Concerning the patterns, more than 70% of the participants were classified into the same or adjacent quarter. However, the Spearman correlation coefficients between the respective pattern scores were low (0.25⁻0.33). The FFQ showed acceptable validity when ranking food group consumption compared to food records. Additionally, the FFQ-derived dietary patterns were consistent with those derived using food record data.

Indexed as

DietDiet RecordsSurveys and QuestionnairesChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEmpirical ResearchFinlandFruitHumansMicronutrientsNutrition AssessmentParentsPrincipal Component AnalysisSample SizeVegetablesMicronutrientschildrencross-classificationDAGIS Studydietary assessment methodsfood diarypreschoolvalidation studywhole diet

Identifiers

PMID30642103
PMCPMC6356196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.