Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30642095›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

High-Throughput Omics and Statistical Learning Integration for the Discovery and Validation of Novel Diagnostic Signatures in Colorectal Cancer.

Nguyen Phuoc Long, Seongoh Park, Nguyen Hoang Anh, Tran Diem Nghi, Sang Jun Yoon, Jeong Hill Park, Johan Lim, Sung Won Kwon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Deciphering the Regulatory Networks of the Migrasome-Associated Cell Subpopulation in Heterotopic Ossification via Multi-Omics Analysis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Influence of S100A2 in Human Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nguyen Phuoc LongCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. phuoclong@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-0546
Seongoh ParkDepartment of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. inmybrain@snu.ac.kr.
Nguyen Hoang AnhCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. 2018-23140@snu.ac.kr.
Tran Diem NghiSchool of Medicine, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh 70000, Vietnam. trandiemnghi@gmail.com.
Sang Jun YoonCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. supercanboy@snu.ac.kr.
Jeong Hill ParkCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. hillpark@snu.ac.kr.
Johan LimDepartment of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. johanlim@snu.ac.kr.
Sung Won KwonCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. swkwon@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-7161-4737
Seoul National University · KRVietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City · VN

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2012M3A9C4048796/2018R1A5A2024425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancement of bioinformatics and machine learning has facilitated the discovery and validation of omics-based biomarkers. This study employed a novel approach combining multi-platform transcriptomics and cutting-edge algorithms to introduce novel signatures for accurate diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Different random forests (RF)-based feature selection methods including the area under the curve (AUC)-RF, Boruta, and Vita were used and the diagnostic performance of the proposed biosignatures was benchmarked using RF, logistic regression, naïve Bayes, and k-nearest neighbors models. All models showed satisfactory performance in which RF appeared to be the best. For instance, regarding the RF model, the following were observed: mean accuracy 0.998 (standard deviation (SD) < 0.003), mean specificity 0.999 (SD < 0.003), and mean sensitivity 0.998 (SD < 0.004). Moreover, proposed biomarker signatures were highly associated with multifaceted hallmarks in cancer. Some biomarkers were found to be enriched in epithelial cell signaling in

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveBayes TheoremBiomarkers, TumorChemotactic FactorsColorectal NeoplasmsComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansIsoantigensLogistic ModelsMachine LearningOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorCD177 protein, humanChemotactic FactorsGPI-Linked ProteinsIsoantigensNR5A2 protein, humanReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearS100A2 protein, humanS100 ProteinsSLC4A4 protein, humanSodium-Bicarbonate SymportersTGFB1 protein, humanTransforming Growth Factor beta1biomarkercolorectal cancerdiagnosismachine learningtranscriptomicsvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID30642095
PMCPMC6358915
OpenAlexW2911188032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.