Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30641944›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2019

Bio-Molecular Applications of Recent Developments in Optical Tweezers.

Dhawal Choudhary, Alessandro Mossa, Milind Jadhav, Ciro Cecconi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Applications of laser technology in the manipulation of human spermatozoa.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dhawal ChoudharyDepartment of Physics, Informatics and Mathematics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy. dhawal.choudhary@unimore.it.
Alessandro MossaIstituto Statale di Istruzione Superiore "Leonardo da Vinci", Via del Terzolle 91, 50127 Firenze, Italy. alessandro.mossa@fi.infn.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1589-8920
Milind JadhavDepartment of Physics, Informatics and Mathematics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy. msjadhav020@gmail.com.
Ciro CecconiDepartment of Physics, Informatics and Mathematics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy. ciro.cecconi@unimore.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6101-2609
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITIstituto Nazionale di Statistica · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past three decades, the ability to optically manipulate biomolecules has spurred a new era of medical and biophysical research. Optical tweezers (OT) have enabled experimenters to trap, sort, and probe cells, as well as discern the structural dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids at single molecule level. The steady improvement in OT's resolving power has progressively pushed the envelope of their applications; there are, however, some inherent limitations that are prompting researchers to look for alternatives to the conventional techniques. To begin with, OT are restricted by their one-dimensional approach, which makes it difficult to conjure an exhaustive three-dimensional picture of biological systems. The high-intensity trapping laser can damage biological samples, a fact that restricts the feasibility of in vivo applications. Finally, direct manipulation of biological matter at nanometer scale remains a significant challenge for conventional OT. A significant amount of literature has been dedicated in the last 10 years to address the aforementioned shortcomings. Innovations in laser technology and advances in various other spheres of applied physics have been capitalized upon to evolve the next generation OT systems. In this review, we elucidate a few of these developments, with particular focus on their biological applications. The manipulation of nanoscopic objects has been achieved by means of plasmonic optical tweezers (POT), which utilize localized surface plasmons to generate optical traps with enhanced trapping potential, and photonic crystal optical tweezers (PhC OT), which attain the same goal by employing different photonic crystal geometries. Femtosecond optical tweezers (fs OT), constructed by replacing the continuous wave (cw) laser source with a femtosecond laser, promise to greatly reduce the damage to living samples. Finally, one way to transcend the one-dimensional nature of the data gained by OT is to couple them to the other large family of single molecule tools, i.e., fluorescence-based imaging techniques. We discuss the distinct advantages of the aforementioned techniques as well as the alternative experimental perspective they provide in comparison to conventional OT.

Indexed as

Optical TweezersDNALab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicroscopy, FluorescenceProteinsDNAProteinsfemtosecond optical tweezersfluorescencephotonic crystal optical tweezersplasmonic optical tweezerssingle molecule and cell studies

Identifiers

PMID30641944
PMCPMC6359149
OpenAlexW2910833797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.