Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30641919›Full record

ReviewCancers2019

Variation in Clinical Application of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Review.

Roxan F C P A Helderman, Daan R Löke, H Petra Kok, Arlene L Oei, Pieter J Tanis, Nicolaas A P Klaas Franken, Johannes Crezee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pleura and peritoneum · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Developing a hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) gynecologic oncology program: a Canadian experience.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roxan F C P A HeldermanDepartment for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental and Molecular and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.c.helderman@amc.uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9692-7115
Daan R LökeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.r.loke@amc.nl.
H Petra KokDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.p.kok@amc.uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8504-136X
Arlene L OeiDepartment for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental and Molecular and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.l.oei@amc.uva.nl.
Pieter J TanisDepartment for Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.j.tanis@amc.uva.nl.
Nicolaas A P Klaas FrankenDepartment for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental and Molecular and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.a.franken@amc.uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-5522-9406
Johannes CrezeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.crezee@amc.uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7474-0533

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 10595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) originating from gastrointestinal and gynecological malignancies are associated with a poor prognosis and rapid disease progression. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an effective treatment option with curative intent. Hyperthermia enhances the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs, thereby killing microscopic tumors and reducing the risk of tumor recurrence. Eight parameters potentially have an impact on the efficacy of HIPEC: the type of drug, drug concentrations, carrier solution, volume of the perfusate, temperature of the perfusate, duration of the treatment, the technique of delivery, and patient selection. In this review, a literature search was performed on PubMed, and a total of 564 articles were screened of which 168 articles were included. Although HIPEC is a successful treatment, there is no standardized method for delivering HIPEC: the choice of parameters is presently largely determined by institutional preferences. We discuss the current choice of the parameters and hypothesize about improvements toward uniform standardization. Quantifying the effect of each parameter separately is necessary to determine the optimal way to perform HIPEC procedures. In vivo, in vitro, in silico, and other experimental studies should shed light on the role of each of the eight parameters.

Indexed as

colorectal cancer (CRC)cytoreductive surgeryHIPECperitoneal carcinomatosisperitoneal metastasis

Identifiers

PMID30641919
PMCPMC6357036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.