Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30641870›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Ciprofloxacin and Clinafloxacin Antibodies for an Immunoassay of Quinolones: Quantitative Structure⁻Activity Analysis of Cross-Reactivities.

Andrey A Buglak, Ilya A Shanin, Sergei A Eremin, Hong-Tao Lei, Xiangmei Li, Anatoly V Zherdev, Boris B Dzantiev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrey A BuglakA. N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 33 Leninsky Prospect, 119071 Moscow, Russia. andreybuglak@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6405-6594
Ilya A ShaninChemical Department, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia. numenor-08@mail.ruf.
Sergei A EreminChemical Department, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia. eremin_sergei@hotmail.com.
Hong-Tao LeiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. hongtao@scau.edu.cn.
Xiangmei LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. lixiangmei12@163.com.
Anatoly V ZherdevA. N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 33 Leninsky Prospect, 119071 Moscow, Russia. zherdev@inbi.ras.ru.ORCID 0000-0003-3008-2839
Boris B DzantievA. N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 33 Leninsky Prospect, 119071 Moscow, Russia. dzantiev@inbi.ras.ru.
A N Bach Institute of Biochemistry · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RUSouth China Agricultural University · CNSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 14-16-00149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common problem in the immunodetection of structurally close compounds is understanding the regularities of immune recognition, and elucidating the basic structural elements that provide it. Correct identification of these elements would allow for select immunogens to obtain antibodies with either wide specificity to different representatives of a given chemical class (for class-specific immunoassays), or narrow specificity to a unique compound (mono-specific immunoassays). Fluoroquinolones (FQs; antibiotic contaminants of animal-derived foods) are of particular interest for such research. We studied the structural basis of immune recognition of FQs by antibodies against ciprofloxacin (CIP) and clinafloxacin (CLI) as the immunizing hapten. CIP and CLI possess the same cyclopropyl substituents at the N1 position, while their substituents at C7 and C8 are different. Anti-CIP antibodies were specific to 22 of 24 FQs, while anti-CLI antibodies were specific to 11 of 26 FQs. The molecular size was critical for the binding between the FQs and the anti-CIP antibody. The presence of the cyclopropyl ring at the N1 position was important for the recognition between fluoroquinolones and the anti-CLI antibody. The anti-CIP quantitative structure⁻activity relationship (QSAR) model was well-equipped to predict the test set (

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntibody SpecificityCiprofloxacinFluoroquinolonesImmunizationImmunoassayMaleModels, MolecularQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipRabbitsAntibodiesCiprofloxacinclinafloxacinFluoroquinolonesciprofloxacinclinafloxacinfluoroquinolonesimmunoassaypolyclonal antibodiesquantitative structure-activity relationship analysis

Identifiers

PMID30641870
PMCPMC6359390
OpenAlexW2910143831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.