ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019
Controversies Surrounding Vitamin D: Focus on Supplementation and Cancer.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Vitamin D Supplementation in Oncology: Chance of Science or Effectiveness?Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Dietary and circulating vitamin D and risk of renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of observational studies.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyPooled it
- Determining the vitamin D supplementation duration to reach an adequate or optimal vitamin D status and its effect on blood lipid profiles: a longitudinal study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
- Vitamin D and Toxic Metals in Pregnancy - a Biological Perspective.Current epidemiology reports · 2024Review
- Article
- The Magic Triangle in Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: Vitamin D, Vitamin D Receptor, and Malignancy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Vitamin D Attenuates Pain and Cartilage Destruction in OA Animals via Enhancing Autophagic Flux and Attenuating Inflammatory Cell Death.Immune network · 2022Article
- Pivotal role of vitamin D in mitochondrial health, cardiac function, and human reproduction.EXCLI journal · 2022Review
- Improving Vitamin D Intake in Young Children-Can an Infographic Help Parents and Carers Understand the Recommendations?Nutrients · 2021Article
- A comprehensive re-assessment of the association between vitamin D and cancer susceptibility using Mendelian randomization.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Parameters of Oxidative Stress, Vitamin D, Osteopontin, and Melatonin in Patients with Lip, Oral Cavity, and Pharyngeal Cancer.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Article
- The role of vitamin D in head and neck cancer.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020Review
- Association between vitamin D and ovarian cancer development inOncotarget · 2020Article
- Article
- Differential Impact of Calcitriol and Its Analogs on Tumor Stroma in Young and Aged Ovariectomized Mice Bearing 4T1 Mammary Gland Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Vitamin D screening.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2020Review
- Role of Vitamin D in Athletes and Their Performance: Current Concepts and New Trends.Nutrients · 2020Review
- Vitamin D, cancer, and dysregulated phosphate metabolism.Endocrine · 2019Review
- Vitamin D and Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has recently been a huge number of publications concerning various aspects of vitamin D, from the physiological to therapeutic fields. However, as a consequence of this very fast-growing scientific area, some issues still remain surrounded by uncertainties, without a final agreement having been reached. Examples include the definitions of vitamin D sufficiency and insufficiency, (i.e., 20 vs. 30 ng/mL), the relationship between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and parathyroid hormone, (i.e., linear vs. no linear), the referent to consider, (i.e., total vs. free determination), the utility of screening versus universal supplementation, and so on. In this review, the issues related to vitamin D supplementation in subjects with documented hypovitaminosis, and the role of vitamin D in cancer will be concisely considered. Daily, weekly, or monthly administration of cholecalciferol generally leads to essentially similar results in terms of an increase in 25(OH)D serum levels. However, we should also consider possible differences related to a number of variables, (i.e., efficiency of intestinal absorption, binding to vitamin D binding protein, and so on). Thus, adherence to therapy may be more important than the dose regimen chosen in order to allow long-term compliance in a sometimes very old population already swamped by many drugs. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions at present regarding the relationship between cancer and vitamin D. In vitro and preclinical studies seem to have been more convincing than clinical investigations. Positive results in human studies have been mainly derived from post-hoc analyses, secondary end-points or meta-analyses, with the last showing not a decrease in cancer incidence but rather in mortality. We must therefore proceed with a word of caution. Until it has been clearly demonstrated that there is a causal relationship, these positive "non-primary, end-point results" should be considered as a background for generating new hypotheses for future investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.