Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30641350›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychiatric research2019

Sex differences in response to ketamine as a rapidly acting intervention for treatment resistant depression.

Marlene P Freeman, George I Papakostas, Bettina Hoeppner, Erica Mazzone, Heidi Judge, Cristina Cusin, Sanjay Mathew, Gerard Sanacora, Dan Iosifescu, Charles DeBattista and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychiatric research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Sex-dependent metabolism of ketamine and (Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Role of Glutamate Underlying Treatment-resistant Depression.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Ketamine treatment for depression: a review.Discover mental health · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Marlene P FreemanMassachusetts General Hospital, USA. Electronic address: mfreeman@partners.org.
George I PapakostasMassachusetts General Hospital, USA.
Bettina HoeppnerMassachusetts General Hospital, USA.
Erica MazzoneMassachusetts General Hospital, USA.
Heidi JudgeMassachusetts General Hospital, USA.
Cristina CusinMassachusetts General Hospital, USA.
Sanjay MathewBaylor College of Medicine/Michael E. Debakey VA Medical Center, USA.
Gerard SanacoraYale University, USA.
Dan IosifescuIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA.
Charles DeBattistaStanford University School of Medicine, USA.
Madhukar H TrivediUniversity of Texas Southwestern, USA.
Maurizio FavaMassachusetts General Hospital, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USSouthwestern University · USStanford University · USYale University · US

Funding

Neurobiological Underpinnings of Placebo Response in DepressionR01MH102279 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CUSIN, CRISTINA, FAVA, MAURIZIO · 2015 to 2019
$3.9M
NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201100006CNIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201100006INIMH NIH HHS HHSN271201100006INIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile ketamine has been increasingly studied for treatment resistant depression (TRD), the impact of sex differences on treatment outcomes has not been well studied. The objective was to ascertain whether there were differences in response to a single administration of ketamine for TRD between men and women, and between pre- and post-menopausal women.

methodsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (N = 99; N = 50 male; N = 49 female) was conducted to investigate the efficacy of intravenous ketamine versus active placebo as augmentation of antidepressant therapy for TRD. Patients were assigned to one of five arms; one-time administration of ketamine of varying doses (i.e., 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg), and one group receiving active placebo (intravenous midazolam). A priori-planned analyses were conducted to compare responses between women and men, as well pre-vs. postmenopausal women.

resultsAnalyses demonstrated no significant differences between women and men in terms of treatment response (F(1,80) = 0.06, p = 0.80). There were no significant differences in the frequency of adverse effects (AEs) reported by those assigned to ketamine treatment groups (p > 0.21 for all AEs reported more than once), although women reported more headaches (12% vs. 6%, p = 0.30) and nausea (10% vs. 6%, p = 0.47). In comparing pre-vs. postmenopausal women, no differences in efficacy were observed (F(1,76) = 0.36, p = 0.55).

conclusionsResults do not support differential efficacy or tolerability of ketamine for the treatment of TRD between women and men, nor based on menopause status among women. However, larger trials with these a priori aims are needed to confirm these results.

Indexed as

PostmenopausePremenopauseSex CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantFemaleHumansKetamineMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntidepressive AgentsKetamineDepressionKetamineMenopauseSex differencesTreatment resistant

Identifiers

PMID30641350
PMCPMC6360121
OpenAlexW2908836405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.