ArticleBiomaterials2019
Probing cellular response to topography in three dimensions.
Article in Biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Form Meets Function: Fiber Architecture Directs Proliferation and Differentiation in Gingival Keratinocytes.Cells · 2026Article
- Expression of Types I and III Collagens and Ultrastructure of the Extracellular Matrix in Rectal Adenocarcinoma of Different Differentiation Degree after Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2024Article
- A Hierarchical Mechanotransduction System: From Macro to Micro.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic significance of keloid-like collagen remodeling patterns in the extracellular matrix of colorectal cancer.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2024Article
- Understanding How Cells Probe the World: A Preliminary Step towards Modeling Cell Behavior?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Unravelling cell migration: defining movement from the cell surface.Cell adhesion & migration · 2022Review
- Multimodal microscale mechanical mapping of cancer cells in complex microenvironments.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- The extracellular matrix alteration, implication in modulation of drug resistance mechanism: friends or foes?Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022Review
- Characterizing and Engineering Biomimetic Materials for Viscoelastic Mechanotransduction Studies.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022Review
- A blueprint of the topology and mechanics of the human ovary for next-generation bioengineering and diagnosis.Nature communications · 2021Article
- The effects of surface topography modification on hydrogel properties.APL bioengineering · 2021Review
- Engineering fiber anisotropy within natural collagen hydrogels.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2021Review
- Bioactive potential of natural biomaterials: identification, retention and assessment of biological properties.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021Review
- Transduction of cell and matrix geometric cues by the actin cytoskeleton.Current opinion in cell biology · 2021Review
- Prognostic significance of abnormal matrix collagen remodeling in colorectal cancer based on histologic and bioinformatics analysis.Oncology reports · 2020Article
- The extracellular matrix in development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2020Review
- Optical elastography and tissue biomechanics.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Biophysical aspects of in vivo tissue microenvironments include microscale mechanical properties, fibrillar alignment, and architecture or topography of the extracellular matrix (ECM). These aspects act in concert with chemical signals from a myriad of diverse ECM proteins to provide cues that drive cellular responses. Here, we used a bottom-up approach to build fibrillar architecture into 3D amorphous hydrogels using magnetic-field driven assembly of paramagnetic colloidal particles functionalized with three types of human ECM proteins found in vivo. We investigated if cells cultured in matrices comprised of fibrils of the same size and arranged in similar geometries will show similar behavior for each of the ECM proteins tested. We were able to resolve spatial heterogeneities in microscale mechanical properties near aligned fibers that were not observed in bulk tissue mechanics. We then used this platform to examine factors contributing to cell alignment in response to topographical cues in 3D laminin-rich matrices. Multiple human cell lines extended protrusions preferentially in directions parallel or perpendicular to aligned fibers independently of the ECM coating. Focal adhesion proteins, as measured by paxillin localization, were mainly diffuse in the cytoplasm, with few puncta localized at the protrusions. Integrin β1 and fascin regulated protrusion extension but not protrusion alignment. Myosin II inhibition did not reduce observed protrusion length. Instead, cells with reduced myosin II activity generated protrusions in random orientations when cultured in hydrogels with aligned fibers. Similarly, myosin II dependence was observed in vivo, where cells no longer aligned along the abluminal surfaces of blood vessels upon treatment with blebbistatin. These data suggest that myosin II can regulate sensing of topography in 3D engineered matrices for both normal and transformed cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.