ReviewJournal of neuroscience methods2019
Measurement of block thresholds in kiloHertz frequency alternating current peripheral nerve block.
Review in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve inhibition using medium frequency alternating current.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Wireless and bioresorbable triboelectric nerve block system for postoperative pain control.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Fascicle-selective kilohertz-frequency neural conduction block with longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Stability of sputtered iridium oxide neural microelectrodes under kilohertz frequency pulsed stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- A bioresorbable peripheral nerve stimulator for electronic pain block.Science advances · 2022Article
- Effects of waveform shape and electrode material on KiloHertz frequency alternating current block of mammalian peripheral nerve.Bioelectronic medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of Intraspinal Nerve Block Anesthesia on Intrapartum Fever and the Neonate.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Combining direct current and kilohertz frequency alternating current to mitigate onset activity during electrical nerve block.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- Quantitative comparisons of block thresholds and onset responses for charge-balanced kilohertz frequency waveforms.Journal of neural engineering · 2020Article
- Counted cycles method to measure the block inception time of kiloHertz frequency mammalian motor nerve block.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2020Article
- Advanced technologies for intuitive control and sensation of prosthetics.Biomedical engineering letters · 2020Review
- Reduction of the onset response in kilohertz frequency alternating current nerve block with amplitude ramps from non-zero amplitudes.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKilohertz frequency alternating currents (KHFAC) produce rapid nerve conduction block of mammalian peripheral nerve and have potential clinical applications in reducing peripheral nerve hyperactivity. The experimental investigation of KHFAC nerve block requires a robust output measure and this has proven to be the block threshold (BT), the lowest current or voltage at which the axons of interest are completely blocked. All significant literature in KHFAC nerve block, both simulations and experimental, were reviewed to determine the block threshold method that was used. The two common methods used are the High-Low method experimentally and the Binary search method for simulations. NEW
methodFour methods to measure the block threshold (High-Low, High-Low-High, Binary and Random) at three frequencies (10, 20 and 30 kHz) were compared through randomized repeated experiments in the in-vivo rodent sciatic nerve-gastrocnemius model.
resultsThe literature review showed that more than 50% of publications did not measure the block threshold. The experimental results showed no statistical difference in the BT value between the four methods. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): However, there were differences in the number of significant onset responses, depending on the method. The run time for the BT determination was the shortest for the High-Low method.
conclusionsIt is recommended that all research in electrical nerve block, including KHFAC, should include measurement of the BT. The High-Low method is recommended for most experimental situations but the Binary method could also be a viable option, especially where onset responses are minimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.