Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30641091›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroscience methods2019

Measurement of block thresholds in kiloHertz frequency alternating current peripheral nerve block.

Leah Marie Roldan, Thomas E Eggers, Kevin L Kilgore, Narendra Bhadra, Tina Vrabec, Niloy Bhadra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of Intraspinal Nerve Block Anesthesia on Intrapartum Fever and the Neonate.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leah Marie RoldanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Thomas E EggersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Kevin L KilgoreDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA; MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA; Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, 10701 East Boulevard, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Narendra BhadraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Tina VrabecDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Niloy BhadraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA; MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA. Electronic address: nxb26@case.edu.
MetroHealth Medical Center · USCase Western Reserve University · USMetroHealth · US

Funding

Integrated Neural Engineering and Rehabilitation Training ProgramT32EB004314 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey R Capadona, Robert F. Kirsch · 2004 to 2026
$6.1M
Combined No Onset Waveform for KiloHertz Frequency Alternating Current Nerve BlockR01EB024860 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BHADRA, NILOY · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024860NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKilohertz frequency alternating currents (KHFAC) produce rapid nerve conduction block of mammalian peripheral nerve and have potential clinical applications in reducing peripheral nerve hyperactivity. The experimental investigation of KHFAC nerve block requires a robust output measure and this has proven to be the block threshold (BT), the lowest current or voltage at which the axons of interest are completely blocked. All significant literature in KHFAC nerve block, both simulations and experimental, were reviewed to determine the block threshold method that was used. The two common methods used are the High-Low method experimentally and the Binary search method for simulations. NEW

methodFour methods to measure the block threshold (High-Low, High-Low-High, Binary and Random) at three frequencies (10, 20 and 30 kHz) were compared through randomized repeated experiments in the in-vivo rodent sciatic nerve-gastrocnemius model.

resultsThe literature review showed that more than 50% of publications did not measure the block threshold. The experimental results showed no statistical difference in the BT value between the four methods. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): However, there were differences in the number of significant onset responses, depending on the method. The run time for the BT determination was the shortest for the High-Low method.

conclusionsIt is recommended that all research in electrical nerve block, including KHFAC, should include measurement of the BT. The High-Low method is recommended for most experimental situations but the Binary method could also be a viable option, especially where onset responses are minimal.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric Stimulation TherapyMuscle, SkeletalNerve BlockNeural ConductionRandom AllocationRats, Sprague-DawleySciatic NerveBlock thresholdElectrical nerve blockKilohertz frequency nerve blockMotor blockRodentSciatic nerve

Identifiers

PMID30641091
PMCPMC6380354
OpenAlexW2909422053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.