Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30640947›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Conservation planning for species recovery under the Endangered Species Act: A case study with the Northern Spotted Owl.

Jeffrey R Dunk, Brian Woodbridge, Nathan Schumaker, Elizabeth M Glenn, Brendan White, David W LaPlante, Robert G Anthony, Raymond J Davis, Karl Halupka, Paul Henson and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A spatial planning approach for the identification of critical habitat for threatened species.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey R DunkDepartment of Environmental Science and Management, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst St. Arcata, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-9272
Brian WoodbridgeUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Golden Eagle Conservation, U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Nathan SchumakerUS Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Lab, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Elizabeth M GlennUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, Portland, OR, United States of America.
Brendan WhiteUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, Portland, OR, United States of America.
David W LaPlanteNatural Resources Geospatial, sMontague, CA, United States of America.
Robert G AnthonyDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Raymond J DavisUS Forest Service, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Karl HalupkaUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Wenatchee, WA, United States of America.
Paul HensonUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, Portland, OR, United States of America.
Bruce G MarcotUSDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, United States of America.
Michele Merola-ZwartjesUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1 Endangered Species Listing Division, Portland, OR, United States of America.
Barry R NoonDepartment of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.
Martin G RaphaelUSDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Olympia, WA, United States of America.
Jody CaiccoUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, Portland, OR, United States of America.
Dan L HansenHumboldt State University Sponsored Programs Foundation, Arcata, CA, United States of America.
Mary Jo MazurekHumboldt State University Sponsored Programs Foundation, Arcata, CA, United States of America.
James ThrailkillUSDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Roseburg Field Office, Roseburg, OR, United States of America.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service · USCal Poly Humboldt · USPacific Northwest Research Station · USColorado State University · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USOregon State University · USUS Forest Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) was listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1990. We applied modern spatial conservation theory and models to evaluate several candidate critical habitat networks, and sought an efficient conservation solution that encompassed the highest value lands for spotted owl recovery rather than maximizing the total area of potential critical habitat. We created a map of relative habitat suitability, which served as input to the spatial conservation prioritization program Zonation. We used the spatially-explicit individual-based population model HexSim to estimate and compare simulated spotted owl population outcomes among a suite of candidate critical habitat networks that varied in size and spatial arrangement under alternative scenarios of future habitat suitability and barred owl (S. varia) effects. We evaluated simulated spotted owl population outcomes, including total population size, and extinction and quasi-extinction likelihoods for 108 combinations of candidate critical habitat networks by habitat change by barred owl scenarios, both range-wide and within 11 distinct portions of the owl's range. Barred owl encounter rates and the amount and suitability of habitat had substantial effects on simulated spotted owl populations. When barred owl encounter rates were high, changes in the amount and suitability of habitat had minimal impacts on population performance. Under lowered barred owl encounter rates, candidate critical habitat networks that included most existing high suitability habitat supported a high likelihood of long-term population persistence. Barred owls are currently the primary driving force behind poor population performance of NSOs; however, our models demonstrated that a sufficient area of high suitability habitat remains essential for recovery when effects of barred owls can be reduced. The modeling approach we employed is sufficiently flexible to incorporate new information about spotted owls as it becomes available and could likely be applied to conservation planning for other species.

Indexed as

StrigiformesAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEndangered Species

Identifiers

PMID30640947
PMCPMC6331132
OpenAlexW2909843488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.