ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2019
Association Between Tidal Volumes Adjusted for Ideal Body Weight and Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04541199 (Randomized Crossover Trial to Compare Driving Pressures in a Closed-loop and a Conventional Mechanical Ventilation Mode in Pediatric Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Crossover Trial to Compare Driving Pressures in a Closed-loop and a Conventional Mechanical Ventilation Mode in Pediatric Patients
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- COVID-19 PICU guidelines: for high- and limited-resource settings.Pediatric research · 2020Guideline
- Association between Age and Mortality in Pediatric and Adult Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Mechanical power and normalized mechanical power in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Delivering Low Tidal Volume With Anesthesia and ICU Ventilators in a Neonatal Lung Model.Respiratory care · 2023Article
- Pathobiology, Severity, and Risk Stratification of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From the Second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2023Review
- Nonadherence to appropriate tidal volume and PEEP in children with pARDS at a single center.Pediatric pulmonology · 2022Article
- Paediatrics: how to manage acute respiratory distress syndrome.Drugs in context · 2021Review
- Update on the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 in pediatric patients.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2020Review
- Ventilator-induced lung injury in children: a reality?Annals of translational medicine · 2019Review
- The authors reply.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe impact of tidal volume on outcomes in mechanically ventilated children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome remains unclear. To date, observational investigations have failed to calculate tidal volume based on standardized corrections of weight. We investigated the impact of tidal volume on mortality and probability of extubation in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome using ideal body weight-adjusted tidal volume.
designRetrospective analysis of an ongoing prospective cohort of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Tidal volume was calculated based on actual body weight and two different formulations of ideal body weight.
settingPICU at a large, tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on conventional ventilation with a documented height or length.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsThere were 483 patients with a measured height or length at pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome onset included in the final analysis, with 73 nonsurvivors (15%). At 24 hours, there remained 400 patients on conventional ventilation. When calculating tidal volume based on ideal body weight by either method, volumes were larger both at onset and at 24 hours compared with tidal volume based on actual body weight (all p < 0.001), and the proportion of patients being ventilated with tidal volumes greater than 10 mL/kg based on ideal body weight was larger both at onset (12.4% and 15.5%) and 24 hours (10.3% and 11.5%) compared with actual body weight at onset (3.5%) and 24 hours (4.0%) (all p < 0.001). Tidal volume, based on both actual body weight and ideal body weight, was not associated with either increased mortality or decreased probability of extubation after adjusting for oxygenation index in the whole cohort, whereas associations between higher tidal volume and poor outcomes were seen in subgroup analyses in overweight children and in severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.
conclusionsOur retrospective analysis of a cohort of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome patients did not find a consistent association between tidal volume adjusted for ideal body weight and outcomes, although an association may exist in certain subgroups. Although it remains to be shown in a prospective trial whether high volumes or pressures are injurious in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome, tidal volume is likely an imprecise parameter for titrating lung-protective ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.