Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30640517›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2018

Current Status and Future Opportunities in Lung Precision Medicine Research with a Focus on Biomarkers. An American Thoracic Society/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Research Statement.

Ann Chen Wu, James P Kiley, Patricia J Noel, Shashi Amur, Esteban G Burchard, John P Clancy, Joshua Galanter, Maki Inada, Tiffanie K Jones, Jonathan A Kropski and 10 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Strategies for Identifying Biomarkers in Severe Asthma.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Circulating biomarkers of airflow limitation across the life span.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024
    Article
  9. Proteomic Biomarkers of Survival in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Endobronchial Ultrasound Image Simulation for Image-Guided Bronchoscopy.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023
    Article
  17. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current diagnosis and treatment.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Redefining critical illness.Nature medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

James P Kiley
Patricia J Noel
Shashi Amur
Esteban G BurchardORCID 0000-0001-7475-2035
Tiffanie K Jones
Jonathan A KropskiORCID 0000-0002-8923-1344

Funding

Mechanisms of Familial Pulmonary FibrosisP01HL092870 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PHILLIPS III, JOHN ATLAS · 2010 to 2020
$21.6M
Role of Genetics in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)R01HL097163 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FINGERLIN, TASHA E., SCHWARTZ, DAVID ALBERT · 2009 to 2018
$16.4M
Interdisciplinary Training Program in Lung ResearchT32HL094296 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Ray Stokes Peebles · 2008 to 2026
$6.3M
Mechanisms of Pulmonary Fibrosis in Hermansky-Pudlak SyndromeR01HL119503 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI YOUNG, LISA R. · 2013 to 2021
$3.6M
CEBPD-Mediated Mechanisms of Glucocorticoid Insensitivity in Severe AsthmaR01HL133433 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HIMES, BLANCA E · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Age-Dependent Pharmacogenomics of Asthma Treatment (ADAPT)R01HD085993 · NICHD · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI WU, ANN CHEN · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Functional Genetics in Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisR33HL120770 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SCHWARTZ, DAVID ALBERT · 2016 to 2018
$1.6M
DNA-Damage Repair In Pulmonary FibrosisK08HL130595 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KROPSKI, JONATHAN ANDREW · 2016 to 2020
$786k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL130595NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL092870NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL097163NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119503NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133433NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL120770NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL094296NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD085993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThousands of biomarker tests are either available or under development for lung diseases. In many cases, adoption of these tests into clinical practice is outpacing the generation and evaluation of sufficient data to determine clinical utility and ability to improve health outcomes. There is a need for a systematically organized report that provides guidance on how to understand and evaluate use of biomarker tests for lung diseases.

methodsWe assembled a diverse group of clinicians and researchers from the American Thoracic Society and leaders from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute with expertise in various aspects of precision medicine to review the current status of biomarker tests in lung diseases. Experts summarized existing biomarker tests that are available for lung cancer, pulmonary arterial hypertension, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and other rare lung diseases. The group identified knowledge gaps that future research studies can address to efficiently translate biomarker tests into clinical practice, assess their cost-effectiveness, and ensure they apply to diverse, real-life populations.

resultsWe found that the status of biomarker tests in lung diseases is highly variable depending on the disease. Nevertheless, biomarker tests in lung diseases show great promise in improving clinical care. To efficiently translate biomarkers into tests used widely in clinical practice, researchers need to address specific clinical unmet needs, secure support for biomarker discovery efforts, conduct analytical and clinical validation studies, ensure tests have clinical utility, and facilitate appropriate adoption into routine clinical practice.

conclusionsAlthough progress has been made toward implementation of precision medicine for lung diseases in clinical practice in certain settings, additional studies focused on addressing specific unmet clinical needs are required to evaluate the clinical utility of biomarkers; ensure their generalizability to diverse, real-life populations; and determine their cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHumansLung DiseasesPrecision MedicineSocieties, MedicalUnited StatesBiomarkersbiomarkerprecision medicinepulmonary

Identifiers

PMID30640517
PMCPMC6835090
OpenAlexW2904410743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.