Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30640498›Full record

SynthesisPsychological bulletin2019

Aging and recognition memory: A meta-analysis.

Scott H Fraundorf, Kathleen L Hourihan, Rachel A Peters, Aaron S Benjamin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The endocannabinoid system and the ageing brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How age and culture impact the neural correlates of memory retrieval.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Protective effects of physical activity on episodic memory during aging are explained by executive functioning.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott H FraundorfLearning Research and Development Center.ORCID 0000-0002-0738-476X
Kathleen L HourihanDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Rachel A PetersLearning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
Aaron S BenjaminDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Funding

Tests of a Global Deficit Model of Age-Related Deficits in Memory JudgmentsR01AG026263 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BENJAMIN, AARON S · 2006 to 2010
$739k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026263NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing a stimulus as previously encountered is a crucial everyday life skill and a critical task motivating theoretical development in models of human memory. Although there are clear age-related memory deficits in tasks requiring recall or memory for context, the existence and nature of age differences in recognition memory remain unclear. The nature of any such deficits is critical to understanding the effects of age on memory because recognition tasks allow fewer strategic backdoors to supporting memory than do tasks of recall. Consequently, recognition may provide the purest measure of age-related memory deficit of all standard memory tasks. We conducted a meta-analysis of 232 prior experiments on age differences in recognition memory. As an organizing framework, we used signal-detection theory (Green & Swets, 1966; Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) to characterize recognition memory in terms of both discrimination between studied items and unstudied lures (d') and response bias or criterion (c). Relative to young adults, older adults showed reduced discrimination accuracy and a more liberal response criterion (i.e., greater tendency to term items new). Both of these effects were influenced by multiple, differing variables, with larger age deficits when studied material must be discriminated from familiar or related material, but smaller when studying semantically rich materials. These results support a view in which neither the self-initiation of mnemonic processes nor the deployment of strategic processes is the only source of age-related memory deficits, and they add to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying those changes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AgedAgingFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersMental RecallRecognition, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID30640498
PMCPMC6481640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.