Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30640475›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2019

Use of PBPK Modeling To Evaluate the Performance of Dissolv It, a Biorelevant Dissolution Assay for Orally Inhaled Drug Products.

Mireille Hassoun, Maria Malmlöf, Otto Scheibelhofer, Abhinav Kumar, Sukhi Bansal, Ewa Selg, Mattias Nowenwik, Per Gerde, Snezana Radivojev, Amrit Paudel and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Particulate bioaerogels for respiratory drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. RespiCellPharmaceutics · 2021
    Article
  9. Optimization of the TranswellPharmaceutics · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mireille HassounKing's College London , Institute of Pharmaceutical Science , London SE1 9NH , U.K.
Maria MalmlöfInhalation Sciences Sweden AB , Hälsovägen 7-9 , 141 57 Huddinge , Sweden.
Otto ScheibelhoferResearch Centre Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH , Inffeldgasse 13 , Graz 8010 , Austria.
Abhinav KumarKing's College London , Institute of Pharmaceutical Science , London SE1 9NH , U.K.
Sukhi BansalKing's College London , Institute of Pharmaceutical Science , London SE1 9NH , U.K.
Ewa SelgInhalation Sciences Sweden AB , Hälsovägen 7-9 , 141 57 Huddinge , Sweden.
Mattias NowenwikInhalation Sciences Sweden AB , Hälsovägen 7-9 , 141 57 Huddinge , Sweden.
Per GerdeInhalation Sciences Sweden AB , Hälsovägen 7-9 , 141 57 Huddinge , Sweden.
Snezana RadivojevResearch Centre Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH , Inffeldgasse 13 , Graz 8010 , Austria.
Amrit PaudelResearch Centre Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH , Inffeldgasse 13 , Graz 8010 , Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3325-7828
Sumit AroraResearch Centre Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH , Inffeldgasse 13 , Graz 8010 , Austria.
Ben ForbesKing's College London , Institute of Pharmaceutical Science , London SE1 9NH , U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-8193-6107
King's College London · GBResearch Center Pharmaceutical Engineering (Austria) · ATKarolinska Institutet · SEGraz University of Technology · AT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dissolution of inhaled drug particles in the lungs is a challenge to model using biorelevant methods in terms of (i) collecting a respirable emitted aerosol fraction and dose, (ii) presenting this to a small volume of medium that is representative of lung lining fluid, and (iii) measuring the low concentrations of drug released. We report developments in methodology for each of these steps and utilize mechanistic in silico modeling to evaluate the in vitro dissolution profiles in the context of plasma concentration-time profiles. The PreciseInhale aerosol delivery system was used to deliver Flixotide aerosol particles to Dissolv It apparatus for measurement of dissolution. Different media were used in the Dissolv It chamber to investigate their effect on dissolution profiles, these were (i) 1.5% poly(ethylene oxide) with 0.4% l-alphaphosphatidyl choline, (ii) Survanta, and (iii) a synthetic simulated lung lining fluid (SLF) based on human lung fluid composition. For fluticasone proprionate (FP) quantification, solid phase extraction was used for sample preparation with LC-MS/MS analysis to provide an assay that was fit for purpose with a limit of quantification for FP of 312 pg/mL. FP concentration-time profiles in the flow-past perfusate were similar irrespective of the medium used in the Dissolv It chamber (∼0.04-0.07%/min), but these were significantly lower than transfer of drug from air-to-perfusate in isolated perfused lungs (0.12%/min). This difference was attributed to the Dissolv It system representing slower dissolution in the central region of the lungs (which feature nonsink conditions) compared to the peripheral regions that are represented in the isolated lung preparation. Pharmacokinetic parameters ( C

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDrug LiberationModels, BiologicalNebulizers and VaporizersAdministration, InhalationAdministration, OralAerosolsAnimalsChromatography, LiquidFemaleFluticasoneLungModels, AnimalPerfusionRatsSolubilityAerosolsFluticasoneFlixotide Evohalerfluticasoneisolated perfused lungsPreciseInhalesimulated lung fluidSurvanta

Identifiers

PMID30640475
PMCPMC6503535
OpenAlexW2909560874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.