ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2019
Use of PBPK Modeling To Evaluate the Performance of Dissolv It, a Biorelevant Dissolution Assay for Orally Inhaled Drug Products.
Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromatographic Characterization of Nasal and Inhalation Drug Products: A Review of Liquid Chromatography Strategies for Formulation Assessment, Particle Size Correlation, and In Vitro Performance Testing.Biomedical chromatography : BMC · 2026Review
- Biopharmaceutical assessment of naloxone permeation through human respiratory epithelial tissues: A chromatographic-mass spectrometric approach with cloud based aerosol dosing and delivery.Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2026Article
- Particulate bioaerogels for respiratory drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024Review
- In vitro Dissolution Testing of Rifampicin Powder Formulations For Prediction of Plasma Concentration-Time Profiles After Inhaled Delivery.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Article
- In Vitro Dissolution and Permeability Testing of Inhalation Products: Challenges and Advances.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Dissolution and Absorption of Inhaled Drug Particles in the Lungs.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Manipulation of Spray-Drying Conditions to Develop an Inhalable Ivermectin Dry Powder.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- RespiCellPharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Optimization of the TranswellPharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Innovative preclinical models for pulmonary drug delivery research.Expert opinion on drug delivery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The dissolution of inhaled drug particles in the lungs is a challenge to model using biorelevant methods in terms of (i) collecting a respirable emitted aerosol fraction and dose, (ii) presenting this to a small volume of medium that is representative of lung lining fluid, and (iii) measuring the low concentrations of drug released. We report developments in methodology for each of these steps and utilize mechanistic in silico modeling to evaluate the in vitro dissolution profiles in the context of plasma concentration-time profiles. The PreciseInhale aerosol delivery system was used to deliver Flixotide aerosol particles to Dissolv It apparatus for measurement of dissolution. Different media were used in the Dissolv It chamber to investigate their effect on dissolution profiles, these were (i) 1.5% poly(ethylene oxide) with 0.4% l-alphaphosphatidyl choline, (ii) Survanta, and (iii) a synthetic simulated lung lining fluid (SLF) based on human lung fluid composition. For fluticasone proprionate (FP) quantification, solid phase extraction was used for sample preparation with LC-MS/MS analysis to provide an assay that was fit for purpose with a limit of quantification for FP of 312 pg/mL. FP concentration-time profiles in the flow-past perfusate were similar irrespective of the medium used in the Dissolv It chamber (∼0.04-0.07%/min), but these were significantly lower than transfer of drug from air-to-perfusate in isolated perfused lungs (0.12%/min). This difference was attributed to the Dissolv It system representing slower dissolution in the central region of the lungs (which feature nonsink conditions) compared to the peripheral regions that are represented in the isolated lung preparation. Pharmacokinetic parameters ( C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.