ArticleJAMA internal medicine2019
Complication Rates and Downstream Medical Costs Associated With Invasive Diagnostic Procedures for Lung Abnormalities in the Community Setting.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05066776 (Liquid Biopsy in Combination With PET/CT Versus PET/CT Alone in Diagnosis of Small Lung Nodules), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Liquid Biopsy in Combination With PET/CT Versus PET/CT Alone in Diagnosis of Small Lung Nodules
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time to Benefit for Lung Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Survival Meta-Analysis.American journal of preventive medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Guideline
- Guideline
- Liquid and Tissue Biopsies for Identifying MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Analyses from the Phase II VISION Study of Tepotinib.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Trial
- Utilization of Diagnostic Procedures After Lung Cancer Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2023Trial
- Detection of early-stage lung cancer in sputum using automated flow cytometry and machine learning.Respiratory research · 2023Trial
- Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making by Persons Who Smoke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Article
- A visual analysis of the research dynamics of biomarkers for lung cancer screening.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Defined Lung Nodule Malignancy Score in Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: The CREATE Study.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
- Surveillance Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Allows for the Safe Reduction in Protocol Transbronchial Biopsies After Lung Transplantation.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
- Article
- Monitoring the Harms of Lung Cancer Screening: Why the Nonmalignant Resection Rate Is Our Best Bet.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2025Article
- Positive Screens Are More Likely in a National Lung Cancer Screening Registry Than the National Lung Screening Trial.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2025Article
- Optimizing Strategy for Lung Cancer Screening: From Risk Prediction to Clinical Decision Support.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Clinical value of serum PRDM16 in early diagnosis and prognosis assessment of lung adenocarcinoma.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Lung cancer screening in people who have never smoked: lessons from East Asia.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence for risk stratification of pulmonary nodules: Ready for primetime?Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2025Review
- Toward a Computable Phenotype for Determining Eligibility of Lung Cancer Screening Using Electronic Health Records.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Genomic Landscape of Advanced Solid Tumors in Middle East and North Africa Using Circulating Tumor DNA in Routine Clinical Practice.Oncology · 2025Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services added lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) as a Medicare preventive service benefit in 2015 following findings from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) that showed a 16% reduction in lung cancer mortality associated with LDCT. A challenge in developing and promoting a national lung cancer screening program is the high false-positive rate of LDCT because abnormal findings from thoracic imaging often trigger subsequent invasive diagnostic procedures and could lead to postprocedural complications. Objective: To determine the complication rates and downstream medical costs associated with invasive diagnostic procedures performed for identification of lung abnormalities in the community setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of non-protocol-driven community practices captured in MarketScan Commercial Claims & Encounters and Medicare supplemental databases was conducted. A nationally representative sample of 344 510 patients aged 55 to 77 years who underwent invasive diagnostic procedures between 2008 and 2013 was included. Main Outcomes and Measures: One-year complication rates were calculated for 4 groups of invasive diagnostic procedures. The complication rates and costs were further stratified by age group. Results: Of the 344 510 individuals aged 55 to 77 years included in the study, 174 702 comprised the study group (109 363 [62.6%] women) and 169 808 served as the control group (106 007 [62.4%] women). The estimated complication rate was 22.2% (95% CI, 21.7%-22.7%) for individuals in the young age group and 23.8% (95% CI, 23.0%-24.6%) for those in the Medicare group; the rates were approximately twice as high as those reported in the NLST (9.8% and 8.5%, respectively). The mean incremental complication costs were $6320 (95% CI, $5863-$6777) for minor complications to $56 845 (95% CI, $47 953-$65 737) for major complications. Conclusions and Relevance: The rates of complications after invasive diagnostic procedures were higher than the rates reported in clinical trials. Physicians and patients should be aware of the potential risks of subsequent adverse events and their high downstream costs in the shared decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.