ReviewActa biomaterialia2019
Bioprinting functional tissues.
Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydrogels for Bioprinting: A Systematic Review of Hydrogels Synthesis, Bioprinting Parameters, and Bioprinted Structures Behavior.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Pooled it
- Suspended particles for omnidirectional template sacrifice for rapid vascular patterning within engineered tissues.Science advances · 2026Article
- High-Density, Extrudable Collagen Types I and II Microfiber-Based Inks for Tissue Engineering Applications.Polymers · 2026Article
- Article
- Transformation of the Biological Paradigm in Bone Regeneration: An Integrative Review.Journal of developmental biology · 2026Review
- Bioink design for organ-scale projection-based 3D bioprinting.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Unconventional bioprinting modalities for advanced tissue biofabrication.Biomaterials · 2026Review
- Engineering Volumetric Tissue Analogs via Assembly of Endothelial Cell-Covered Spheroidal Microtissues.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Tuning Rheology and Printability of Gelatin Methacryloyl/Sodium Alginate Bioinks: The Role of Sodium Alginate Molar Mass and Sterilization.ACS omega · 2025Article
- The Synergy of Artificial Intelligence and 3D Bioprinting: Unlocking New Frontiers in Precision and Tissue Fabrication.Advanced functional materials · 2025Article
- Bioprinting for drug screening: A path toward reducing animal testing or redefining preclinical research?Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Advanced roll porous scaffold 3D bioprinting technology.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025Review
- Assessment of the viability and mechanoresponsiveness of hMSC-TERT printed with bioinert, thermoresponsive hydrogels.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hydrogel-Based Bioinks for Coaxial and Triaxial Bioprinting: A Review of Material Properties, Printing Techniques, and Applications.Polymers · 2025Review
- Bioprinted Hydrogels as Vehicles for the Application of Extracellular Vesicles in Regenerative Medicine.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Promise and Challenges of Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Leveraging printability and biocompatibility in materials for printing implantable vessel scaffolds.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Progress in Organ Bioprinting for Regenerative Medicine.Engineering (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Robot-based 6D bioprinting for soft tissue biomedical applications.Engineering in life sciences · 2024Article
- (3D) Bioprinting-Next Dimension of the Pharmaceutical Sector.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the numerous lives that have been saved since the first successful procedure in 1954, organ transplant has several shortcomings which prevent it from becoming a more comprehensive solution for medical care than it is today. There is a considerable shortage of organ donors, leading to patient death in many cases. In addition, patients require lifelong immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection postoperatively. With such issues in mind, recent research has focused on possible solutions for the lack of access to donor organs and rejections, with the possibility of using the patient's own cells and tissues for treatment showing enormous potential. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a rapidly emerging technology, which holds great promise for fabrication of functional tissues and organs. Bioprinting offers the means of utilizing a patient's cells to design and fabricate constructs for replacement of diseased tissues and organs. It enables the precise positioning of cells and biologics in an automated and high throughput manner. Several studies have shown the promise of 3D bioprinting. However, many problems must be overcome before the generation of functional tissues with biologically-relevant scale is possible. Specific focus on the functionality of bioprinted tissues is required prior to clinical translation. In this perspective, this paper discusses the challenges of functionalization of bioprinted tissue under eight dimensions: biomimicry, cell density, vascularization, innervation, heterogeneity, engraftment, mechanics, and tissue-specific function, and strives to inform the reader with directions in bioprinting complex and volumetric tissues. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: With thousands of patients dying each year waiting for an organ transplant, bioprinted tissues and organs show the potential to eliminate this ever-increasing organ shortage crisis. However, this potential can only be realized by better understanding the functionality of the organ and developing the ability to translate this to the bioprinting methodologies. Considering the rate at which the field is currently expanding, it is reasonable to expect bioprinting to become an integral component of regenerative medicine. For this purpose, this paper discusses several factors that are critical for printing functional tissues including cell density, vascularization, innervation, heterogeneity, engraftment, mechanics, and tissue-specific function, and inform the reader with future directions in bioprinting complex and volumetric tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.