Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30639215›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2019

X-Chromosome Dosage Modulates Multiple Molecular and Cellular Properties of Mouse Pluripotent Stem Cells Independently of Global DNA Methylation Levels.

Juan Song, Adrian Janiszewski, Natalie De Geest, Lotte Vanheer, Irene Talon, Mouna El Bakkali, Taeho Oh, Vincent Pasque

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Roles of the Rlim-Rex1 axis during X chromosome inactivation in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cohesin controls X chromosome structure remodeling and X-reactivation during mouse iPSC-reprogramming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan SongKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven Stem Cell Institute, Leuven Cancer Institute, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: juan.song@kuleuven.be.
Adrian JaniszewskiKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven Stem Cell Institute, Leuven Cancer Institute, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Natalie De GeestKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven Stem Cell Institute, Leuven Cancer Institute, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Lotte VanheerKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven Stem Cell Institute, Leuven Cancer Institute, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Irene TalonKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven Stem Cell Institute, Leuven Cancer Institute, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Mouna El BakkaliKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven Stem Cell Institute, Leuven Cancer Institute, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Taeho OhKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven Stem Cell Institute, Leuven Cancer Institute, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Vincent PasqueKU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven Stem Cell Institute, Leuven Cancer Institute, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: vincent.pasque@kuleuven.be.
Rega Institute for Medical Research · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reprogramming female mouse somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) leads to X-chromosome reactivation. The extent to which increased X-chromosome dosage (X-dosage) in female iPSCs compared with male iPSCs leads to differences in the properties of iPSCs is still unclear. We show that chromatin accessibility in mouse iPSCs is modulated by X-dosage. Specific sets of transcriptional regulator motifs are enriched in chromatin with increased accessibility in XX or XY iPSCs. The transcriptome, growth and pluripotency exit are also modulated by X-dosage in iPSCs. To understand how increased X-dosage modulates the properties of mouse pluripotent stem cells, we used heterozygous deletions of the X-linked gene Dusp9. We show that X-dosage regulates the transcriptome, open chromatin landscape, growth, and pluripotency exit largely independently of global DNA methylation. Our results provide insights into how gene dosage modulates the epigenetic and genetic mechanisms that regulate cell identity.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCellular ReprogrammingChromatinDNA MethylationDual-Specificity PhosphatasesEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsFemaleGene DosageInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMaleMiceMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase PhosphatasesPluripotent Stem CellsTranscriptomeChromatinDual-Specificity PhosphatasesMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphataseschromatin accessibilityDNA methylationdosage compensationiPS cellsmouse pluripotent stem cellspluripotencyX-chromosome inactivationX-chromosome reactivationX dosage

Identifiers

PMID30639215
PMCPMC6372905
OpenAlexW2910960849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.