Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30639104›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2019

The Genomic Footprints of the Fall and Recovery of the Crested Ibis.

Shaohong Feng, Qi Fang, Ross Barnett, Cai Li, Sojung Han, Martin Kuhlwilm, Long Zhou, Hailin Pan, Yuan Deng, Guangji Chen and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Shaohong FengUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China; China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Qi FangChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ross BarnettCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cai LiChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, UK.
Sojung HanInstitute of Evolutionary Biology (UPF-CSIC), PRBB, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Martin KuhlwilmInstitute of Evolutionary Biology (UPF-CSIC), PRBB, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Long ZhouChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Hailin PanChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Yuan DengChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Guangji ChenUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Anita GamaufMuseum of Natural History Vienna, 1st Zoological Department - Ornithology, Burgring 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria.
Friederike WoogStaatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany.
Robert Prys-JonesBird Group, Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Akeman St, Tring, Herts HP23 6AP, UK.
Tomas Marques-BonetInstitute of Evolutionary Biology (UPF-CSIC), PRBB, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; Catalan Institution of Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Passeig de Lluís Companys, 23, 08010, Barcelona, Spain; CNAG-CRG, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri i Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifici ICTA-ICP, c/ Columnes s/n, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.
M Thomas P GilbertCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark; Norwegian University of Science and Technology, University Museum, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Guojie ZhangState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China; China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China. Electronic address: guojie.zhang@bio.ku.dk.

Funding

2/2 Somatic mosaicism and autism spectrum disorderU01MH106874 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SESTAN, NENAD · 2015 to 2019
$4.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIMH NIH HHS U01 MH106874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human-induced environmental change and habitat fragmentation pose major threats to biodiversity and require active conservation efforts to mitigate their consequences. Genetic rescue through translocation and the introduction of variation into imperiled populations has been argued as a powerful means to preserve, or even increase, the genetic diversity and evolutionary potential of endangered species [1-4]. However, factors such as outbreeding depression [5, 6] and a reduction in available genetic diversity render the success of such approaches uncertain. An improved evaluation of the consequence of genetic restoration requires knowledge of temporal changes to genetic diversity before and after the advent of management programs. To provide such information, a growing number of studies have included small numbers of genomic loci extracted from historic and even ancient specimens [7, 8]. We extend this approach to its natural conclusion, by characterizing the complete genomic sequences of modern and historic population samples of the crested ibis (Nipponia nippon), an endangered bird that is perhaps the most successful example of how conservation effort has brought a species back from the brink of extinction. Though its once tiny population has today recovered to >2,000 individuals [9], this process was accompanied by almost half of ancestral loss of genetic variation and high deleterious mutation load. We furthermore show how genetic drift coupled to inbreeding following the population bottleneck has largely purged the ancient polymorphisms from the current population. In conclusion, we demonstrate the unique promise of exploiting genomic information held within museum samples for conservation and ecological research.

Indexed as

GenomeInbreedingPolymorphism, GeneticAnimalsBirdsEndangered Speciesancient genomicsconservation genomicsdemographyendangered speciesextinctiongenetic recoveryinbreedingmutation loadornithologypopulation genomics

Identifiers

PMID30639104
PMCPMC6345625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.