Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30639093›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2019

Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.

Shelley Potter, Elizabeth J Conroy, Ramsey I Cutress, Paula R Williamson, Lisa Whisker, Steven Thrush, Joanna Skillman, Nicola L P Barnes, Senthurun Mylvaganam, Elisabeth Teasdale and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
22.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Shelley PotterBristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK; Bristol Breast Care Centre, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: shelley.potter@bristol.ac.uk.
Elizabeth J ConroyClinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ramsey I CutressFaculty of Medicine, Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paula R WilliamsonNorth West Hub for Trials Methodology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Lisa WhiskerNottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Steven ThrushBreast Unit, Worcester Royal Hospital, Worcester, UK.
Joanna SkillmanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Nicola L P BarnesNightingale Breast Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Senthurun MylvaganamNew Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Elisabeth TeasdalePatient representative, Liverpool, UK.
Abhilash JainDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Imperial College London NHS Trust, London, UK; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
Matthew D GardinerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Imperial College London NHS Trust, London, UK; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.
Jane M BlazebyBristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Chris HolcombeLinda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
iBRA Steering Group
Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative
Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBNew Cross Hospital · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBWorcestershire Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2016-16-019Department of Health NIHR-CS-011-014Department of Health PB-PG-0214-33065Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUse of biological or synthetic mesh might improve outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction-breast reconstruction with implants or expanders at the time of mastectomy-but there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the safety or effectiveness of the technique. We aimed to establish the short-term safety of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction performed with and without mesh, to inform the feasibility of undertaking a future randomised clinical trial comparing different breast reconstruction techniques.

methodsIn this prospective, multicentre cohort study, we consecutively recruited women aged 16 years or older who had any type of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction for malignancy or risk reduction, with any technique, at 81 participating breast and plastic surgical units in the UK. Data about patient demographics and operative, oncological, and complication details were collected before and after surgery. Outcomes of interest were implant loss (defined as unplanned removal of the expander or implant), infection requiring treatment with antibiotics or surgery, unplanned return to theatre, and unplanned re-admission to hospital for complications of reconstructive surgery, up to 3 months after reconstruction and assessed by clinical review or patient self-report. Follow-up is complete. The study is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, number ISRCTN37664281.

findingsBetween Feb 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016, 2108 patients had 2655 mastectomies with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction at 81 units across the UK. 1650 (78%) patients had planned single-stage reconstructions (including 12 patients who had a different technique per breast). 1376 (65%) patients had reconstruction with biological (1133 [54%]) or synthetic (243 [12%]) mesh, 181 (9%) had non-mesh submuscular or subfascial implants, 440 (21%) had dermal sling implants, 42 (2%) had pre-pectoral implants, and 79 (4%) had other or a combination of implants. 3-month outcome data were available for 2081 (99%) patients. Of these patients, 182 (9%, 95% CI 8-10) experienced implant loss, 372 (18%, 16-20) required re-admission to hospital, and 370 (18%, 16-20) required return to theatre for complications within 3 months of their initial surgery. 522 (25%, 95% CI 23-27) patients required treatment for an infection. The rates of all of these complications are higher than those in the National Quality Standards (<5% for re-operation, re-admission, and implant loss, and <10% for infection).

interpretationComplications after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction are higher than recommended by national standards. A randomised clinical trial is needed to establish the optimal approach to immediate implant-based breast reconstruction.

fundingNational Institute for Health Research, Association of Breast Surgery, and British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.

Indexed as

MastectomySurgical MeshAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast ImplantationCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30639093
PMCPMC6358590
OpenAlexW2908552389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.