ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2019
Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
94 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 194 citations in OpenAlex.
- Absorbable Synthetic Meshes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Subcutaneous Mastectomy: A Systematic Review with Clinical and Economic Considerations.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Ischemic Complications and Salvage Following Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- The Usage of Mesh and Relevant Prognosis in Implant Breast Reconstruction Surgery: A Meta-analysis.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative complications of prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Proton Beam Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- The use of porcine acellular dermal matrices in implant-based breast reconstruction: A systematic literature review.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Short-term Outcomes of Polydioxanone Synthetic Mesh in 2-stage Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center Comparative Study.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2026Article
- Decreasing Time to Definitive Breast Reconstruction: National Trends and Patient-Level Predictors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Soft Tissue Scaffolds in Breast Reconstruction: Evolution from Acellular Dermal Matrices to Synthetic Polymers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of the Implementation of a Bundle Protocol for the Reduction of Postmastectomy Reconstruction Failures.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Impact of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy on Surgical Outcomes in Management of Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.The breast journal · 2026Article
- Patterns of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in Immediate Breast Reconstruction-Results From the iBRA-2 Cohort Study.International journal of breast cancer · 2026Article
- Are thin flaps still a contraindication? Early outcomes of prepectoral DTI reconstruction in a large single-center cohort.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluating the impacts of previous breast surgery on surgical complications and aesthetic outcomes in reverse-sequence endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with or without direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUse of biological or synthetic mesh might improve outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction-breast reconstruction with implants or expanders at the time of mastectomy-but there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the safety or effectiveness of the technique. We aimed to establish the short-term safety of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction performed with and without mesh, to inform the feasibility of undertaking a future randomised clinical trial comparing different breast reconstruction techniques.
methodsIn this prospective, multicentre cohort study, we consecutively recruited women aged 16 years or older who had any type of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction for malignancy or risk reduction, with any technique, at 81 participating breast and plastic surgical units in the UK. Data about patient demographics and operative, oncological, and complication details were collected before and after surgery. Outcomes of interest were implant loss (defined as unplanned removal of the expander or implant), infection requiring treatment with antibiotics or surgery, unplanned return to theatre, and unplanned re-admission to hospital for complications of reconstructive surgery, up to 3 months after reconstruction and assessed by clinical review or patient self-report. Follow-up is complete. The study is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, number ISRCTN37664281.
findingsBetween Feb 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016, 2108 patients had 2655 mastectomies with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction at 81 units across the UK. 1650 (78%) patients had planned single-stage reconstructions (including 12 patients who had a different technique per breast). 1376 (65%) patients had reconstruction with biological (1133 [54%]) or synthetic (243 [12%]) mesh, 181 (9%) had non-mesh submuscular or subfascial implants, 440 (21%) had dermal sling implants, 42 (2%) had pre-pectoral implants, and 79 (4%) had other or a combination of implants. 3-month outcome data were available for 2081 (99%) patients. Of these patients, 182 (9%, 95% CI 8-10) experienced implant loss, 372 (18%, 16-20) required re-admission to hospital, and 370 (18%, 16-20) required return to theatre for complications within 3 months of their initial surgery. 522 (25%, 95% CI 23-27) patients required treatment for an infection. The rates of all of these complications are higher than those in the National Quality Standards (<5% for re-operation, re-admission, and implant loss, and <10% for infection).
interpretationComplications after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction are higher than recommended by national standards. A randomised clinical trial is needed to establish the optimal approach to immediate implant-based breast reconstruction.
fundingNational Institute for Health Research, Association of Breast Surgery, and British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.