Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30638441›Full record

SynthesisSports health

Quadriceps Strength and Volitional Activation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Caroline Lisee, Adam S Lepley, Thomas Birchmeier, Kaitlin O'Hagan, Christopher Kuenze

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline LiseeDepartment of Kinesiology, College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Adam S LepleyDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Thomas BirchmeierDepartment of Kinesiology, College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Kaitlin O'HaganDivision of Sports Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Christopher KuenzeDepartment of Kinesiology, College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Michigan State University · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

context: Quadriceps function is a significant contributor to knee joint health that is influenced by central and peripheral factors, especially after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

objective: To assess differences of unilateral quadriceps isometric strength and activation between the involved limb and contralateral limb of individuals with ACLR and healthy controls. DATA SOURCES:: Web of Science, SportDISCUS, PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database were all used during the search. STUDY SELECTION:: A total of 2024 studies were reviewed. Twenty-eight studies including individuals with a unilateral history of ACLR, isometric knee extension strength normalized to body mass, and quadriceps activation measured by central activation ratios (CARs) through a superimposed burst technique were identified for meta-analysis. The methodological quality of relevant articles was assessed using a modified Downs and Black scale. Results of methodological quality assessment ranged from low to high quality (low, n = 10; moderate, n = 8; high, n = 10). STUDY

design: Meta-analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level 2. DATA EXTRACTION:: Means, standard deviations, and sample sizes were extracted from articles, and magnitude of between-limb and between-group differences were evaluated using a random-effects model meta-analysis approach to calculate combined pooled effect sizes (ESs) and 95% CIs. ESs were classified as weak ( d < 0.19), small ( d = 0.20-0.49), moderate ( d = 0.50-0.79), or large ( d > 0.80).

results: The involved limb of individuals with ACLR displayed lower knee extension strength compared with the contralateral limb (ES, -0.78; lower bound [LB], -0.99; upper bound [UB], -0.58) and healthy controls (ES, -0.76; LB, -0.98; UB, -0.53). The involved limb displayed a lower CAR compared with healthy controls (ES, -0.84; LB, -1.18; UB, -0.50) but not compared with the contralateral limb (ES, -0.15; LB, -0.37; UB, 0.07). The ACLR contralateral limb displayed a lower CAR (ES, -0.73; LB, -1.39; UB, -0.07) compared with healthy control limbs but similar knee extension strength (ES, -0.24; LB, -0.68; UB, -0.19).

conclusion: Individuals with ACLR have bilateral CAR deficits and involved limb strength deficits that persist years after surgery. Deficits in quadriceps function may have meaningful implications for patient-reported and objective outcomes, risk of reinjury, and long-term joint health after ACLR.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionMuscle StrengthAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionKneeMaleQuadriceps MuscleSex FactorsTorqueACLRcentral activation ratioisometric knee extension strengthquadriceps function

Identifiers

PMID30638441
PMCPMC6391557
OpenAlexW2909852984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.