Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30637887›Full record

Trial reportAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2019

Pilot Trial of an Emergency Department-based Intervention to Promote Child Passenger Safety Best Practices.

Michelle L Macy, Deepika Kandasamy, Ken Resnicow, Rebecca M Cunningham

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Prevention of "bygone futures" due to road traffic injuries in children.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle L MacyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Deepika KandasamyThe Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Division of General Pediatrics, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ken ResnicowSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rebecca M CunninghamDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

A Brief Intervention to Increase Size-Appropriate Child Passenger Restraint UseK23HD070913 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MACY, MICHELLE LEA · 2012 to 2016
$670k
ACL HHS R49CE002099NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD070913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite demonstrated effectiveness of child restraint systems (CRSs), use remains suboptimal. In this randomized pilot trial, we sought to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of "Tiny Cargo, Big Deal" an ED-based intervention to promote guideline-concordant size-appropriate CRS use.

methodsParents of children < 11 years old were recruited in two EDs and randomized in a 2 × 2 factorial design to four conditions: 1) generic information sheet, 2) tailored brochure mailed after the ED visit, 3) a single motivational interviewing-based counseling session in the ED, and 4) full intervention (counseling session plus tailored brochure). We assessed feasibility (recruitment, completion, follow-up rates) and acceptability (parent attitudes, uptake of information) in the ED, at 1 month and at 6 months. We obtained preliminary estimates of effect sizes of the intervention components on appropriate CRS use at 6-month follow-up.

resultsOf the 514 parents assessed for eligibility, 456 met inclusion criteria and 347 consented to participate. Enrolled parents were mostly mothers (88.1%); 48.7% were 18 to 29 years old; 52.5% were non-Hispanic, white; and 65.2% reported size-appropriate CRS use. Completion rates were 97.7% for baseline survey, 81.6% for counseling, 51.9% for 1-month follow-up, and 59.3% for 6-month follow-up. In the ED, 70.5% rated thinking about child passenger safety in the ED as very helpful. At 1 month, 70.0% expressed positive attitudes toward the study. Of 132 parents who reported receiving study mailings, 78.9% reviewed the information. Parents randomized to the full intervention demonstrated an increase (+6.12 percentage points) and other groups a decrease (-1.69 to -9.3 percentage points) in the proportion of children reported to use a size-appropriate CRS at 6-month follow-up.

conclusionsSuboptimal CRS use can be identified and intervened upon during a child's ED visit. A combined approach with ED-based counseling and mailed tailored brochures shows promise to improve size-appropriate CRS use.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolChild Restraint SystemsCounselingEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleParentsPatient Education as TopicPilot ProjectsPregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30637887
PMCPMC6626697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.