Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30637827›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2019

Actions to influence the care network of home-dwelling elderly people: A qualitative study.

Wendy Kemper-Koebrugge, Marian Adriaansen, Miranda Laurant, Michel Wensing

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wendy Kemper-KoebruggeFaculty of Health and Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4468-9447
Marian AdriaansenFaculty of Health and Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Miranda LaurantFaculty of Health and Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michel WensingIQ Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
HAN University of Applied Sciences · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive impact of care networks of home-dwelling elderly people may be based on several network mechanisms: navigation to resources, negotiation between participants and contagion of behaviours. Little is known about actions of participants-elderly people, informal caregivers or formal care providers-to activate such mechanisms and generate support. Aim of this study was to identify actions in relation to these network mechanisms. A cross-sectional qualitative study of 48 interviews with home-dwelling elderly people, informal caregivers and formal care providers in the eastern parts of the Netherlands was conducted between March and September 2016. A framework analysis on network mechanisms categorised actions. Actions were reviewed by network party and compared between networks to explore relations between actions and networks. Results showed that participants navigated through existing relations to seek support. Actions on negotiation were aimed at ameliorating existing relations. Few examples and no actions on contagion of behaviours were found. Actions seemed driven by incidents and existing relations. Elderly people rarely initiated actions, informal caregivers felt hampered by their position in the network. Consistent patterns of relations between actions and network characteristics did not emerge. We concluded that the full potential of network-based support of elderly people is probably underused. Particularly promising seem: navigating the neighbourhood for new informal care, using opposite opinions as a catalyst for change and bringing quality of life and dilemma's into dialogue in the network.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHome Care ServicesHome NursingHumansMaleNetherlandsQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeResidence Characteristicscare-givingcare of elderly peopleinformal carequalitative methodologiessocial support

Identifiers

PMID30637827
PMCPMC6850451
OpenAlexW2909190523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.