ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2019
Validation and reliability of a disease-specific quality-of-life measure in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Toward Better Response Assessment of Cutaneous Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Report from the National Institutes of Health Consensus Project Task Force.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Guideline
- Modern Therapies for Discoid Lupus Erythematosus: A Narrative Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Recommendations for the use of CLASI as an outcome measure in cutaneous lupus erythematosus clinical trials.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Approaches for Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: a Changing Landscape of Clinical Trials.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Exosomes in Systemic Autoimmune Diseases: Recent Advances in Diagnostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Development of the lichen planus quality of life questionnaire (LPQoL) informed by expert clinician input and patient feedback: a retrospective survey study.Archives of dermatological research · 2023Article
- Clinical aspects of cutaneous lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease assessment: Highlighting CLE outcome measures.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Development of a working core outcome set for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a practical approach to an urgent unmet need.Lupus science & medicine · 2021Review
- Cutaneous lupus concerns from the patient perspective: a qualitative study.Lupus science & medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- The Possible Relation ofIranian journal of parasitologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2021
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a potentially disfiguring, chronic autoimmune disease with variable skin manifestations, negatively affecting patients' quality of life (QoL). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures assessing QoL in patients with CLE have been generic or developed without input from patients.
objectivesTo demonstrate the reliability and validity of a disease-specific QoL measure for CLE - the cutaneous lupus erythematosus quality of life (CLEQoL).
methodsOne hundred and one patients with CLE were recruited, and each patient was asked to complete the CLEQoL. Internal consistency was used as a measure of reliability. Validity was measured in two ways - structural validity via exploratory factor analysis and convergent validity via Spearman correlations between CLEQoL and the Short Form 36 (SF-36), visual analogue scales and clinical variables. Patient demographic and disease characteristics were collected.
resultsThe mean ± SD age of patients with CLE was 48 ± 13 years, with discoid lupus (n = 72; 71.3%) being the most predominant CLE subtype. Patients were mostly female (n = 88; 87·1%) and African American/Black (n = 59; 58·4%). Internal consistency ranged from 0·67 to 0·97. Five domains (functioning, emotions, symptoms, body image/cosmetic effects and photosensitivity) were extracted with a total explained variance of 71·1%. CLEQoL-related domains correlated with SF-36 domains (r range -0·39 to -0·65).
conclusionsThe CLEQoL was found to be a valid and reliable PRO measure for assessing QoL in patients with CLE. Demonstrating that the CLEQoL has strong psychometric properties is an important step towards the development of a disease-specific PRO measure that future clinical trials can use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.