ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2019
Perceived health of patients with common variable immunodeficiency - a cluster analysis.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency of depression and anxiety in patients with inborn errors of immunity: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Quality of Life of Patients With Multi-Organ Autoimmune Disease and Its Relationship to Patient-Centered Care: Protocol for a Longitudinal Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Positive psychological profiles based on perceived health clustering in patients with cardiovascular disease: a longitudinal study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Reflects a TFrontiers in immunology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a complex disease with various influences on perceived health, which correlate with different outcomes, including new morbidity and mortality. Our hypothesis was that CVID patients fall into distinct clusters of perceived health which can inform care. Ward hierarchical cluster analysis and K-means cluster analysis were performed on data of 209 CVID patients to identify subgroups regarding their self-reported physical and mental health status, assessed by the physical (PCS) and mental component scores (MCS) of the Short Form-12 (SF-12). Four clusters of CVID-patients were identified. Cluster 1 was the largest cluster, characterized by a relatively high physical and mental health status (44·0%). In contrast, cluster 2 (21·1%) included patients with low physical and mental health status. Clusters 3 and 4 were mixed groups with high mental and low physical health (15·8%) and vice versa (19·1%). Significant differences between the clusters were found for patient-reported outcomes such as work ability and health literacy, but not for CVID-associated complications such as enteropathy, interstitial lung disease, granulomatosis, lymphadenopathy and autoimmune cytopenia or laboratory parameters such as immunoglobulin levels or B cell-based classification. The results suggest different subgroups of CVID patients with contrasting individual needs which, surprisingly, did not differ in clinical or laboratory characteristics. The main finding of this study is that patients with CVID fall into four distinct clusters according to perceived health, which are largely independent of CVID complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.