Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30637653›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2019

Molecular characterization of Ehrlichia canis from naturally infected dogs from the state of Rio de Janeiro.

Renata Lins da Costa, Patrícia Gonzaga Paulino, Claudia Bezerra da Silva, Gabriela Lopes Vivas Vitari, Maristela Peckle Peixoto, Ana Paula Martinez de Abreu, Huarrisson Azevedo Santos, Carlos Luiz Massard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular Investigation of the p28 Gene ofVeterinary medicine international · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Renata Lins da CostaDepartment of Animal Parasitology, Veterinary Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, BR 465, km 7, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, 23890-000, Brazil. renatalins.costa@yahoo.com.br.
Patrícia Gonzaga PaulinoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Veterinary Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Claudia Bezerra da SilvaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Veterinary Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gabriela Lopes Vivas VitariDepartment of Animal Parasitology, Veterinary Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, BR 465, km 7, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, 23890-000, Brazil.
Maristela Peckle PeixotoDepartment of Animal Parasitology, Veterinary Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, BR 465, km 7, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, 23890-000, Brazil.
Ana Paula Martinez de AbreuDepartment of Animal Parasitology, Veterinary Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, BR 465, km 7, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, 23890-000, Brazil.
Huarrisson Azevedo SantosDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Veterinary Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carlos Luiz MassardDepartment of Animal Parasitology, Veterinary Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, BR 465, km 7, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, 23890-000, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the genetic diversity of Ehrlichia canis in naturally infected dogs from six mesoregions of Rio de Janeiro state. E. canis was diagnosed with a real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting a 93 base pair (bp) fragment of the 16S rDNA gene. To evaluate the genetic diversity of the parasite, we amplified a positive sample from each mesoregion by distinct conventional PCR assays with targets in the gp19 (414 bp), gp36 (814 bp), and p28 (843 bp) genes. A total of 267 samples were collected from dogs in Rio de Janeiro state. Among the samples analyzed, 42.3% (n = 113/267) were 16S rDNA-qPCR positive. When performing PCR for the gp19 and gp36 genes, 100% (n = 113/113) and 5.3% (n = 6/113) of the samples amplified fragments of 414 bp and 814 bp, respectively. The six PCR-positive samples for the gp36 gene also amplified the p28 gene fragment. The characterization based on the gp19 gene demonstrated that it is highly conserved. In protein analysis (TRP36), all samples showed a tandem repeat protein (TRP) that comprised 11 replicates. Seven high-entropy amino acid sites were distributed throughout the gp36 gene. Eleven high-entropy amino acid sites were found throughout the p28 gene. There is a positive selection pressure in both genes (p ≤ 0.05). Comparing and characterizing an organism are useful for providing important information about the host's immune response and identifying new antigenic targets, as well as essential characteristics for the development of vaccines and new diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsBrazilDog DiseasesDogsEhrlichia canisEhrlichiosisGenetic VariationPhylogenyBacterial ProteinsCanine monocytic ehrlichiosisEpitopesGenetic diversityMolecular markers

Identifiers

PMID30637653
PMCPMC6863331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.