ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2019
Improved blood culture workflow for faster identification of KPC-producing Enterobacterales.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Rapid Carbapenemase Genes Detection Method with Xpert Carba-R from Positive Blood Cultures Compared with NG-Test Carba 5 and Sequencing.Infection and drug resistance · 2022Article
- Assessment of the Bacterial Pollution and Detection of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Benin: Case of the Hydrographic Channel Complex Cotonou-Nokoué Lake.Journal of environmental and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carba-NP original report for blood cultures described the need of subculture and mechanical lysis before testing, reaching the turnaround time of approximately 4 hours for sample preparation. We tested 100 consecutive blood cultures positive for Gram-negative bacilli on the Gram stain from a large clinical laboratory. Bacterial pellets were prepared by centrifugation and submitted to Carba-NP and Blue-Carba tests and used further to prepare smears for Vitek MS. Results obtained with colonies grown on sheep blood agar using the same methodologies were used as the gold standard. Carbapenemase genes were confirmed by PCR and DNA sequencing. Vitek MS identified correctly 86% of the samples. Of note, 7% of the samples were incorrectly reported by the instrument as containing a single isolate. KPC-2 was the predominant carbapenemase detected. There was 100% concordance for both negative and positive results for Carba-NP. In contrast, for Blue-Carba the concordance for positive results was 92.8%, and 41% of strains negative for carbapenemases presented a yellowish color on control well turning the test non-interpretable. The turnaround time for sample preparation for preparing the pellet was 13 min, and no subculture or mechanical lysis is needed when detecting KPC production in Enterobacterales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.