Attitudes of Mental Health Peer-Run Organizations Towards Health Homes: Recommendations for Policy and Practice.

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth SiantzDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive #0622, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0901, USA. esiantz@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8305-3818

Laysha OstrowLive & Learn, Inc., 785 Quintana Road, Suite 219, Morro Bay, CA, 93442, USA.

Funding

CHILD MH SERVICES AND SERVICE SYSTEM RESEARCHT32MH019545 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LEAF, PHILIP J · 1992 to 2017

$6.3M

NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019545

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined peer-run organizations' attitudes towards collaborating in health homes. Data were drawn from the 2012 National Survey of Peer-Run Organizations. Multinomial logistic regression modeled the association between organizational willingness to participate in a health home and salient factors. Current efforts (OR = 5.05; p < 0.05), planned efforts (OR = 4.27; p < 0.05) to encourage physical healthcare, and staff size (OR = 1.09; p < 0.05) were associated with willingness to collaborate in health homes. Some organizations were concerned about power dynamics with potential medical collaborators. Relationships with medical providers, staffing capacity, and concerns about coercion should be considered when integrating peer-run organizations and health homes.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthPeer GroupCommunity Mental Health CentersHumansLogistic ModelsMental Health ServicesPractice Guidelines as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesChronic careHealth homesIntegrated careManagementPeer-run organizationsPeer support

Identifiers

PMID30637534

DOI10.1007/s10597-019-00366-z

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.