Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30637491›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2019

Reconstructing imagined letters from early visual cortex reveals tight topographic correspondence between visual mental imagery and perception.

Mario Senden, Thomas C Emmerling, Rick van Hoof, Martin A Frost, Rainer Goebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Individualized functional magnetic resonance imaging neuromodulation enhances visuospatial perception: a proof-of-concept study.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mario SendenDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6201 BC, Maastricht, The Netherlands. mario.senden@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5598-6167
Thomas C EmmerlingDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6201 BC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rick van HoofDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6201 BC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Martin A FrostDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6201 BC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rainer GoebelDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6201 BC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council 269853European Research Council () 779860Horizon 2020 7202070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual mental imagery is the quasi-perceptual experience of "seeing in the mind's eye". While a tight correspondence between imagery and perception in terms of subjective experience is well established, their correspondence in terms of neural representations remains insufficiently understood. In the present study, we exploit the high spatial resolution of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 7T, the retinotopic organization of early visual cortex, and machine-learning techniques to investigate whether visual imagery of letter shapes preserves the topographic organization of perceived shapes. Sub-millimeter resolution fMRI images were obtained from early visual cortex in six subjects performing visual imagery of four different letter shapes. Predictions of imagery voxel activation patterns based on a population receptive field-encoding model and physical letter stimuli provided first evidence in favor of detailed topographic organization. Subsequent visual field reconstructions of imagery data based on the inversion of the encoding model further showed that visual imagery preserves the geometric profile of letter shapes. These results open new avenues for decoding, as we show that a denoising autoencoder can be used to pretrain a classifier purely based on perceptual data before fine-tuning it on imagery data. Finally, we show that the autoencoder can project imagery-related voxel activations onto their perceptual counterpart allowing for visually recognizable reconstructions even at the single-trial level. The latter may eventually be utilized for the development of content-based BCI letter-speller systems.

Indexed as

Brain MappingVocabularyAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansImaginationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationSurveys and QuestionnairesVisual CortexVisual PathwaysVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30637491
PMCPMC6499877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.